Originally Posted by
Modest Proposal
I am not trying to stir up a fight but there is something slightly absurd about this conversation. I have read Baldwin 3 times in college and have heard him referenced and applauded COUNTLESS times. His novels, stories and essays are read (it seems) frequently in the California University system.
What I think is absurd is that EVERY time I have read him it has been in a class specifically geared at either "Queer Theory" or "African American" literature.
To everyone saying he is neglected because he is black and gay--what kind of literature programs are/were you involved in? From my exprience these qualities are cause for MORE attention in acadamia. If anything the constant attention he gets for his genetics and lifestyle (as opposed to focusing on his literary merits) is, to me, offensive.
A book lasts because people want to read it for some reason. Otherwise, it can be kept alive because academia deems it "worthy" of study. Baldwin has not fared extremely well in the popular public (what can you say, neither does Joyce). He is kept relevent almost exclusively by the academic community which the posters in this thread seem to think is racist and homophobic. It is strange that people are blaming the group MOST responsible for his relevence for his limited readership, but it is more strange that people are suggesting that the academic community is not obviously huge advocates of gay-rights and racial diversity. Have you read modern criticism?