Originally Posted by
Sancho
I didn’t have a chance to watch a lot of it, but what I saw I enjoyed. I guess I prefer the races as opposed to the judged events. On the track, in the pool, on the bike, the first one across the line gets the gold. I understand those sports.
You know, Danik, I’m no expert but I don’t think the athletes get any government funding here, except secondarily through school sports programs. I’ve seen a few news stories about which colleges “won” the Olympics. Also there have been a few stories about how past legislation in the US Congress effected the games for US athletes, specifically Title IX of the Education Act. Title IX is anti-discrimination legislation for any schools receiving federal funding. Nowadays it’s become shorthand for women’s sports. Colleges can’t just take all the government bucks and roll them into the football team, they gotta put some of the money into the softball team too. Title IX was passed back in the 70s and evidently it’s having some effect. As in Brazil, the women here brought home more medals than the men did this time.
As for the sports that aren’t commonly supported by colleges, archery, badminton, breakdancing (Go Raygun!), and the like, I get the sense the athlete’s parents are draining their 401k accounts to support their child’s dreams. (A 401k is a tax-advantaged retirement account.)