Class Participation Make-Up
What makes a narrator reliable?
Is Offred a reliable narrator? Why / why not? What textual evidence supports your conclusion?
What are other time-related factors at work in the novel?
A narrator is only as good as what they see and hear and how well they can recall events unbiased. For example the narrator from The Great Gatsby stated in the beginning of the novel that he would be unbiased, but then throughout the novel the reader has to question if he really is telling the story in a purely factual way.
Offred's reliability as a narrator depends on the aspects she is judged. From a storyline standpoint, she is not very reliable. As the historians mention at the end of the book, she doesn't speak much about the government, or national events. She speaks about her life and her day to day troubles. However looking at this from a message standpoint, Offred is reliable because she shows all the turmoil in her life. In this case her bias is a good thing because how she is feeling is important to how the story is told.
:shocked: (I don't think I understand this last question...) Offred always has al this time off but there is nothing she can do. Either the marthas do any chores she could have, or she isn't allowed to do an activity. In this society, just going for a walk without a reason is dangerous because it attracts government attention. Another important time is th night. Most of the things Offred does that she isn't supposed to do is done at night. This may be because of it's darkness and shadow.