Originally Posted by
JuniperWoolf
...That was the obvious implied knowledge that I was banking on when I first employed sarcasm in the following sentence:
I was trying to make people think "haha, no one outside of Northern Canada has 'how to survive a grizzly attack' in school anymore, silly, no where else has grizzly bears of course! And no one except for a hunter would care about the distinction between a compound and a recurve bow, that's completely useless knowledge to most people!" without this obvious conlusion in mind, the light-hearted point I was trying to make (that I'm considered "boyish" to many litnetters because of my location and the lifestyle/hobbies, such as hunting, adopted by my Northern-Canadian friends and family including myself) doesn't work. The entire point of all of this being that I know that I'm strange to some of you in terms of gender stereotypes, and I am the way I am (as you are the way you are) because of my upbringing, which implies that the way we think about gender is the result of environment rather than genetics (or "nurture rather than nature," although I hate that stupid trendy term).
I'm tired of explaining my posts, I've got to remember to ALWAYS include the sarcasm disclaimer. I thought that the "...What?" pre-curser was classic-comedy-sketch enough to hammer the implied sarcasm home without the disclaimer. Ah well, I was warned that this would happen.