So we can say, that the conclusion is women have terrible literary tastes :D
Printable View
Although the sample is somewhat limited, the fact that Lolita has twice as many votes as any of the other examples, and that that Harry Potter has as many votes as Les Miserables, is intriguing. Based on these findings, it would appear that women have an extraordinary interest in paedophilia and the ability to confuse great literature with nonsense.
I'm reserving judgement until I see what the male preferred reading list reveals.
Assuming that one is being prepared.
WOW! The data results is so insignificant that I see very little worth in trying to interpret the outcome.
I didn't get that many takers last time so it is a pretty small sample. I might repeat the test and see how many I get this time round.
better do so (and perhaps take some nice crime novels in ... they are missing) ... and start a male list as well ... we want scientifically relevant results.. this is a serious study (and I'm shocked, seeing these results)
I would say if you wanted scientifically relevant results you would need a large sample size of randomly chosen men and women. Then you would probably have to provide each person chosen for the study with a selection of books, anyone who has read the books before would have to be excluded from the study. Then they would have to read every book and rank them, and they would have be prohibited from accessing external opinions about the books.
Then you could perhaps have some data on men and women's reactions to a specific set of books which may or may not be valuable for extrapolating insights onto larger groups. Depends on what kind of trends arise.
Of course, this would all be a humongous waste of money.
I'm not surprised that Lolita's top of the list. I can't pinpoint exactly why but I'm not surprised.