In praise of a poet and a poet-critic
It's not often that a review is so well done about new collection of poems by a prolific poet. In this NYTimes book review, the critic exhibits both skill and experience with author-subject and contemporary poetry. What follows is excerpt from this review and samples of the poetry which make you want to explore her work further. ........................"A State of Disobedience" (title of the review)
By JOEL BROUWER
Published: October 14, 2007
Over the course of Alice Notley’s long and prolific career — she’s written more than 25 books since 1971 — readers have assigned her any number of identities: native of the American West, Parisian expatriate, feminist, experimentalist, political poet, Language poet, widow of the poets Ted Berrigan and Douglas Oliver, mother of the poets Anselm and Edmund Berrigan and member of the New York School’s second generation, to name a few. Each of these labels sheds a little light on Notley’s work, but it’s the fact of their sheer number that’s most illuminating: this is a poet who persistently exceeds, or eludes, the sum of her associations.
IN THE PINES
By Alice Notley.
131 pp. Penguin Poets. Paper, $18.
“I’ve been trying to train myself for 30 or 40 years not to believe anything anyone tells me,” Notley has written, and anyone coming to her work for the first time would be wise to follow that example, scraping away the barnacles of received wisdom that cling to her poems, and also casting aside any assumptions about where poetry comes from, or what it should sound like, look like and concern itself with. To write vital poems, Notley has said, “it’s necessary to maintain a state of disobedience against ... everything.” To read such poems requires a similar discipline.
In her new book’s long title sequence, Notley finds that space of perpetual defiance and christens it “the pines.” There, she imagines all conventions of causality and rationality have fallen away, creating an opening for the purely accidental quality of each lived instant, a quality the poet identifies as “love.”
"I am losing my because. In the pines.
In chance, in fortune, in luck, there is no because.
Once I had, and now I don’t.
In love there is no because."
.......................................{copyright New York Times, Sunday Book Review, October 15, 2007)