laughs...im late to the game but I appreciate your wondering what I think, thank you.
its for sure a tangled web, and I think the two major weavers in the web are government involvement our lives in general and in this instance in particular, and the question of what's the relationship between our consumerism and our morality.
from my perspective as to the first part, as soon as government gets involved in the market, thus begins the process of their picking winners and losers (who are not the consumers, and isn't that the whole point of international trade?), excessive lobbying, special interests, inconsistency, more government, and loss of liberty.
as to the second part, my simple libertarian maxim is educate the people and allow them to make choices. tell people the circumstances behind the creation of the product, the consequences of this choice vs that choice, and then that gives them reign to buy, or not to buy, based on economic interests, or moral ones.
on the whole, i believe protectionism hurts the poor in other parts of the world (more than the 25 cents an hour sweat shops), and allows people here in America whose time has passed to continue to exist (unions for instance).
i haven't read this, but the cato institute is a libertarian think tank and so i trust this is a pretty in depth view of the tension between the two:
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.or.../pdf/pa723.pdf

