Quote:
Is it possible that you failed to catch the part where I said that the problem seems to lie with the fact that philosophers and scientists can't accept the Biblical records as written? And if we go even further back you will find that I believe in Evolution, the type known as adaptation of species to environment, which causes changes. But my faith in God as the Creator remains unshaken. I will admit that the age of the Earth and the animals remains a mystery, and that since time itself means nothing to God, the time measurements in Genesis are arbitrary. One thing that struck me recently though, was the National Geographic Special on the chimpanze that had always walked upright like a man. His head was also shaped differently. Science began to wonder if he were perhaps a crossbreed. DNA proved he was a chimp, but had an extra chromozone. His face and head reminded me a lot of the "Lucy" being. He was that one in a million chance that is possible, but not probable. Still, he existed, and they have pictures, film footage, his DNA, and his skeleton for proof. But it makes me wonder about some fossil evidence where they only have 1 skull or so. Do they really have a complete species, or is it that same one in a million chance repeated?
As you may notice, I ask a question based on scientific reaserch here. It was never even discussed. Had I based the question on the Bible, I believe the expression "the fur would have flown" would fit the bill very well. Later I asked about the coelacanth, thought extinct for millions of years yet alive and virtually unchaged, and why evolution seems to have skipped aligators and crocidiles. Again no answer. Be ready at anytime to answer those who question, even if you must say an honest "I don't know. Let me do some research." Otherwise, it appears that you do the same thing you accuse the religious people of doing--ignore what doesn't fit. :)