J.K Rowling.
though, as a children's author, she's quite good at it.
Printable View
J.K Rowling.
though, as a children's author, she's quite good at it.
I don't mind Rowling
"this is a thread for all the writers that we've been told are great and are in the classics range and constantly appear on 100greatestnovels lists and such like but we hate."
Hmm but that was the original objective of the thread. I don't think Meyer's books have ever been classified as "great", neither have they achieved the status of classics.
They have by some tiddlywinks who think they are the epitome of literature
Im going with the cliched choice, Stephen King.
She has written this rubbish series called Twilight, which millions of girls have fawned over.
I always liked Rowling. Her attempt at grasping the readers' thoughts and imagination is successful. The stories are interesting. Her writing is excellent.
As for Woolf, I beg to disagree that she is a good writer. She seems more of confused and confusing to the readers. Her fans call her works challenging but, isn't a chalenging piece of reading something that could eventually be understood?
Christopher Paolini, by a long shot
Rowling is most certainly overrated--I'll agree with that.
I've been bored stiff several times when attempting V.S. Naipaul.