The moslem mash is on. We will mangle maul and mutilate them for sassing back. With an average 85 IQ, will they be a big loss?
Possibly. For remember, 85 or not, these people were innovators and keepers of algebra 800 years ago. East injuns are only average 85, too, yet they produced the likes of Ramanujan. Such populations only have to overcome one additional standard deviation more than a population with average 100 to produce their own super genius. This frequency can be calculated.
Any human population will produce an occasional super genius. These are the only people that matter. You and I matter to ourselves and a few family members, and a tiny fraction of us that might trickle down to the rest of humanity through an individual or two we influenced. As soon as we die the forgetting of us starts, and it proceeds very fast.
Arabs (middle east), east injuns and negros will not produce the super genius as often, but each super genius is important enough to change the world if they get the right training at the right time early. Ramanujan did not get the right training, yet his ideas were powerful enough for him to become an immortal of mathematics. People like Ramanujan or Euler or Omar Kayaam matter and belong to everyone. Let's say everyone matters, but everyone does not matter to everyone else the way those three do. That is simply a nicer way to put it.
The fact is, everyone who is not a super genius has a job--breed and try to create one; help fund and create universities and educational structures capable of nourishing those of the highest intellectual order. It takes a pyramidal structure. If first class education had been available to Ramanujan, I guarantee we would not live in the same world right now.
Certain swaths of China and east Asia average 106 IQ, compared to the American 98. The highest average IQ belongs to Hasidic Jews, at a lofty 110.
A curiosity of those aforementioned Asian populations is their low variance. They cluster about their average more strongly, meaning a lot of high average people with fewer geniuses. A steeper bell curve that rides its asymptote sooner. Don't count 'em out, though. The world's greatest living mathematician is generally considered to be Terrence Tao, a Japanese. My Finns and Swedes and eastern europeans may be the kings of variance, and of course they built the world once they were handed the baton in the human relay, but even with higher variance they may not match the number of third world super geniuses in the near future, due to population distribution.
Do not write back crying and squalling, trying to dispute what IQ numbers mean. I don't know everything they mean. They are excellent indicators of certain talents, but far from flawless. They are better at measuring abstract intelligence than they are creative intelligence. Some people believe they are hugely culturally biased. I believe much intelligence flys under the radar of IQ tests, but still they do capture quite a bit.
None of that is my domain, folks. I am just disseminating the numbers.
If you have to club a religion like seals, its stands to reason to start with moslems, since they are on the low IQ end and are causing problems. They only have to be clubbed because they will not go away fast enough and become in actu atheists and agnostics like the rest of us. They are back at Plymouth Rock in terms of social evolution and we do not have time to tolerate the same ignorance from them we once perpetuated.
It is a sad fact of humans since their beginning that the less advanced are almost always the ones getting clubbed like seals by their smarter brothers with a little more testosterone. Savage, tough and smart beats savage tough and average, that is what the moslems are not smart enough to assess.
The biggest shame is that so many peaceful people get plowed under in wars. All wars have an element of pogrom in them. Human cruelty unleashed is awesome. You have to be a perpetrator, a victim or an artist to know it. Cruelty is easily accessible in us all. You can tell by the number of denials.
The world is moving a certain way socially, and those who do not come along will be clubbed down, literally or figuratively.
Old birds like me do not decide where the world is going anymore, but become good at seeing the ineluctable direction of those movements and their results in advance.
The young birds have decided that:
1 They will have the world the old farts (founding fathers) promised.
2 Global climate change has a big human footprint
3 Gay mariage is fine
4 There are not as many murders in countries where guns are banned.
5 I am "spiritual," but not a church goer.
6 We want social democracy with more emphasis on social.
7 Abortion is in
8 Bad moslems must be clubbed
The young birds have a massive dependency on technology. That is their weakness. The old birds have a massive dependency on their prescription drugs. There is really no one to challenge who is not strongly dependent on something which can be cut off. I do not think the young birds are in charge any more than the old birds are, just a little more receptive to the views of those image makers shaping their views into a world direction.
In the end it is not about making people free, but about making them good customers. Good customers do not go around blowing other customers up. The image makers shape a world where monster money still rules under a different robe. The propaganda machine has advanced so far since the time of Ivy Lee and Edward Bernaise that I have no doubt the masters could convince people who were slaves they were free and better off than most others; could convince people who were poorer than they used to be that they are the luckiest people in the world, etc., etc., etc.
Who really decides the direction your world is moving in?
Agree with them or not, I feel the above listed views are as good as already done. They are the way the United States is moving and the way the world will follow.
