Originally Posted by
Musicology
Yanni,
You are obviously determined to prove (to your own satisfaction, at least) that G. Cocchi was author of the works of almost unlimited numbers of people, although your 'timeline' is entirely your own, has not been presented here and is unlikely to be, and nor can you begin to tell us how one man could possibly have achieved all you claim of Cocchi, without a vast network existing of which he was but a part. But of the aims and purposes of such a network or of one giant Cocchi you have no real suggestion, nor have you ever spent time to examine the nature of the network in which he operated or it's major and obvious weaknesses. They consist of dozens, even hundreds of weaknesses which would be, frankly, laughed at. But your notes do make sense if you see Cocchi as one element of a far larger picture. That of an entire network, of which Cocchi was one part. And is that not what I have repeatedly suggested from the start ?
You refer to Ferney. But here again Voltaire met Casanova at Ferney. Proof positive Cocchi is Voltaire and is also Casanova, no doubt ? One could waste one's entire life on such things. And I would not like you to waste your time in realising (as the evidence so plainly says) members of the Cocchi clan were only one group of people within a vast cultural network. Known more widely as the 'Enlightenment' but consisting of fraternal associates who invented (amongst other things) the careers of their own invented heroes.
I post here text of the exchanges recently made with the Music Library Director of the Royal College of Music here in London reference background to the 3 'Haydn' operas associated with his two visits to London in 1791/2. As earlier promised. Indicating (as already said) none of these 3 'Haydn' operas were his. I offer this as further proof that I am not dogmatic about anything. That I have (unlike others) being willing from the start to attribute to G. Cocchi the role of being an active musical member of a vast network, part of whose aim was to create the mythical reputations of Haydn and Mozart. Since no other interpretation makes sense and none is consistent with the evidence I have found. Anyway here, in several posts, are the text of those exchanges with Dr. Horton of the Royal College of Music in London, reference Haydn and 'his' operas associated with London, none of which were performed there. So you see I've examined that matter in some detail. As said earlier. And have numerous other notes on just that one subject of 'Haydn operas'. These posts may convince you this affair is not exclusively Cocchi, but involved various other composers. If it convinces you of that I will be glad to know of it -
(I will continue on a second post). Anyway, here goes -
Dear Dr Horton,
10th January 2010
JOSEF HAYDN AUTOGRAPH SCORE OF THE OPERA 'ARMIDA' (1783/4) AT THE LIBRARY OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF MUSIC, LONDON
Thank you for help over a number of years on various enquiries related to the musical assets of the RCM Library.
I understand from a number of sources the RCM Library possesses the autograph score of Josef Haydn's opera 'Armida' (1783/4) written at Esterhazy. If so, may I please ask a few questions of this particular operatic score ?
1. Am I correct in thinking this operatic score at RCM is complete ?
2. Does RCM library also hold performance parts of this opera from the late 18th or early 19th century ?
3. Is it known how this operatic score first came to be in the RCM Library ? Did it possibly come to London with Josef Haydn himself during one of his two visits made here in the 1790's - (at which time Haydn had hopes to write another opera but which, as it happened, remained unfinished) ? Any information on the arrival here in England of that score of 'Armida' and of how it frst arrived at the RCM would certainly be very useful.
and finally -
4. Does RCM Library hold any musical scores by composers such as Giuseppe Sarti (1729-1802) ?
Regards
Robert Newman
//
To which I received the following reply -(dated 11th January 2010)
Dear Mr Newman,
Thank you for your enquiry. We do indeed hold the autograph score of Haydn’s 'Armida', but it lacks 30 folios from Act 2 (the end of scene 6, scene 7 and part of scene 8). These are now in the Houghton Library of Harvard University – see Anthony van Hoboken, Joseph Haydn Thematisch-bibliographisches Werkverzeichnis (Mainz: B. Schott’s Söhne, 1971), vol. 2, p420-21, for details. We do not, however, possess performance parts and it was not in fact performed in London as a result of the retirement of J. Gallini, who had commissioned it for the King’s Theatre, before Haydn’s score had arrived. Unknown to those in London , the work had been composed for Esterhazy in 1784.
Joseph Salomon acted as agent for Haydn in England and, as Gallini refused to accept the score, took possession of it (and paid for it) himself. On Salomon’s death it was bequeathed to William Ayrton who subsequently sold it and it passed into the ownership of the Earl of Falmouth. After the latter’s death in 1852 it was sold (in 1853) as part of his library and acquired by the Sacred Harmonic Society, whose library was in turn presented to the RCM on its opening in 1883.
We have a number of manuscripts by Sarti, details of many of which can be found in the RCM online catalogue.
With best wishes,
Dr Peter Horton
Reference Librarian
Royal College of Music
Prince Consort Road
London SW7 2BS
UK
//
And I wrote again (11th January 2010) -
OPERATIC SCORE OF HAYDN'S 'ARMIDA' (1783)
Thank you so very much for the highly informative and speedy reply to my questions on 'Armida'.
I have to hand various works such as 'Concert Life in London from Haydn to Mozart' by S. McVeigh and 'Amico - The Life of Giovanni Battista Viotti' by W. Lister (with various other publications related to the history of the London opera scene of that time) and am so very grateful you have filled in a number of glaring gaps in my knowledge on this subject of 'Armida'. Frankly, I was completely unaware 'Armida' was originally intended to be performed in London under an arrangement made betweeen Gallini and Josef Haydn ! Does any documentary evidence exist of a 'deal' made for Haydn's 'Armida' to be staged in London ? And, if its cancellation was due to Gallini's retirement under what circumstances was 'L'anima del filosofo, ossia Orfeo ed Euridice' planned for London performance during Haydn's tours here ? Is it your view this opera was begun by Haydn only after the plan to stage 'Armida' had already collapsed ?
Please forgive me writing again at length but the content of your letter is of such great interest to me. Secondly, since the score of 'Armida' came to London with Haydn/Salomon on tour here was it cancelled before their arrival ? Or have I misunderstood you ? I have no knowledge of when or what agreement was made between Gallini and Salomon/J. Haydn on this work. The reason is that 'L'anima del filosofo, ossia Orfeo ed Euridice' was itself planned for London performance during Haydn's tours though it too was not staged as you know. But was this last opera begun by Haydn after plans to stage 'Armida' had collapsed ? I am obviously missing some documentation of which I was not aware.
And finally, I note 30 folios are missing in London from the score of 'Armida' which are today at Harvard. Which brings me to my last point and question on this opera.
You will already be aware of the curious fact that -
A facsimile of an autograph page of 11 bars by Mozart of what H.C. Robbins Landon called, "corrections to the score'' of the closing duet in Act I of Armida". (K506a Nr.4). This autograph page is today held at the MS Department of the University of Bonn. These are not 'corrections' but alterations in 3 coloratura passages in that duet. In 1982 G. Federer pointed out this 'Mozart' version had even been entered into a copy of this work today held at Einstadt (Landes Museum). This (supposedly) originating from a copy made by a later Vienna copyist. Alan Tyson noted this Mozart autograph page (11 bars long) is written on paper definitely made after 1784.
Furthermore, an account by one of Haydn's very earliest biographers, Framery, states that G. Sarti had attended a performance of Armida in Eszterhaza, and was fascinated by this work. ( 'Armida' was as you know to some extent influenced by Sarti's earlier 'Giulio Sabino' (premiered in Venice) which was itself later performed at Esterhaza).
So my last (third) question is -
Are there any plans for the missing 30 folios of this score to be returned to RCM Library ?
Thank you for any further assistance in these queries.
//
Continued on another post.
//