The trouble with this is that you are arguing against the argument for the existence of God.
If it’s a bad world, then there is the possibility of a more perfect God that could create the perfect ‘good world’ That would mean that the God who creates a ‘bad world’ is less perfect than a God who creates a perfect ‘good world’ which would mean he can’t be God, who by definition is perfect and would not create something imperfect if he has it in his nature to be perfect, for that would mean he is not perfect.

