I can't imagine what I'm missing here, as the garden scene ends Act III, and the abdication scene closes Act IV.
I can't understand how we can be discussing Act III, when we've discussed what's in Act IV.
I am now hopelessly confused. :(
Before we move on (or backwards), I just want to say something more about "divine right."
I do think Shakespeare believed wholeheartedly in it. One of the common threads that runs through all the history plays is: Is the King (or Queen) of England divinely anointed/appointed. Shakespeare seems to think yes, as he highlights the fact that the consequences of overthrowing or conspiring to overthrow a king or queen is subject to the most dire of consequences.
The reign of Henry IV was marked by lifelong problems, problem that could only be set right by Henry V. Even Richard II is haunted by the murder of the Duke of Gloucester. In some of the plays, like "Hamlet" and "Julius Caesar," for example, literal ghosts make their appearance.
I think Shakespeare was a firm believer that English kings and queens were divinely anointed.

