Yeah I had a big response typed up and then realized it was purely political. There's no point. Minds don't get changed on internet forums.
Printable View
Yeah. (I think this is the first time we agree on anything.)
To further that thought, some are honest mistakes, some are downright criminal.
I'm cool with that.Quote:
(I hope you don't mind that I completed your sentence there)
So true. It has a tendency to deteriorate into arguments and even name calling and that's bad, though not quite a sin.
I think both politics and religion are moot points. Religion discussions should be limited to the texts and not the validity of religion as it's a matter of faith and that's an indisputable personal choice. Then again I don't make the rules here.
originally posted by Haunted;
What health reforms? All I'm aware of is they changed the food pyramid.
:hurray::smilielol5::lol:
I can only report the perception here, although I am aware of the media's influence. The thing is, if there were political interference in our perception of what happened in New Orleans, then it would be pro US. I have to say that I'm not against any country, and I am very well aware of the drawbacks in the UK.
I'll mention Obama if I feel he illustrates a point. After all I was responding to this:
We have hundreds of welfare laws in the United States that protect people from neglect and they are evolving. And we have hundreds of laws that protect people from negligence.
from Cafolini. What he says doesn't come across to me from what I see, and this from Haunted:
What health reforms? All I'm aware of is they changed the food pyramid.
seems to support that idea in so far as it's worse than I thought. Now not looking after your own people let alone anyone else - that's a sin.
Stop talking politics! I am trying hard to obey the rules but this is like facing all you can eat Chinese on a strict diet.
But Darcy...I can't really see Chinese food (or at least MOST Chinese foods) that can really be off limits to a diet. I just made some stir fry last night for a group of friends. It was all quite healthy (generally speaking) except if you would consider me adding molasses to the chicken's sauce. Then we had fresh fruit with freshly whipped cream for dessert.
Besides, if it is a "sin" to talk politics, then we would be defining an aspect of sin and it would all be applicable to the original post.
politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics, politics
Sorry - are we talking sin? :biggrinjester:
Well it's difficult not to elect a career politician in the broader sense but, in UK terms, if you don't want such a person you might end up with someone like Denis Skinner who, I suspect, Paul may well be supportive of. As an American you may not know of him but just Google his name and take in some of the YouTube videos that come to light.