Originally Posted by
Dark Muse
It seems to me the very fact that you have to come up with all these exceptions, scenarios, hyptheticals, etc. just to try and prove that infidelity is not morally wrong, should in itself tell you something about your claim.
And how it is exactly, that an act can be considered to be to be perfectly legitimate only under certain sets of circumstances.
That is your claim seems to be well infidelity is not immoral seems to only occur under very realistically unlikely guidelines.
Being that the partner never suspects or finds out about it.
Those having the affair both always remember to use proper protection and get a sexual medical history upon each other in advance (as if)
and by now chance should a child be accidentally be conceived (as the child would surely suffer under such circumstances)
And sets you are sitting up such strait ramifications to justify infidelity, you confess that it is wrong under normal circumstances, that being if the act is indeed discovered or some other consequence result.
But it is a legitimate act as long as it is kept under complete and total secrecy.
That is a rather ludicrous argument to make. If an act would be wrong under discovery than it is just as equally wrong when kept in secrecy, and if it has to be kept a secretly to justify doing it, that in itself proves the wrongness of it.
