Originally Posted by
NikolaiI
...
One example, well, I would give a specific situation of walking down the hall, let's us say in a hotel, as it will give a point of reference, on a carpet. Now, in my opinion, based on my experiences, this has meaning. I know that saying this doesn't imbue meaning. But even if every time I do this act again in my life I do not experience "meaning," still, by my past experiences, I have become convinced that meaning still is there.
I know that saying that an experience such as walking down a hall on carpet has meaning does not convey that meaning. And saying that that meaning can't really be understood simply by normal experience doesn't convey it either. And I would try to continue to discuss it, even if it seems elusive. Meaning is elusive.
What I would say about an experience - could be any experience, doesn't have to be one or the other - is that the experience has meaning, beyond perhaps what we would understand just by experiencing it, if it is an ordinary experience, and further, that meaning has meaning. So there is infinite meaning. I was discussing this with Uberzensch and he said that we were saying the same thing, as he was saying that there was no meaning. And at this I had to agree. No meaning is the same as infinite meaning, but not if you think that no meaning means there is nothing to realize.
How can I know there is nothing to realize? How can I know there is nothing beyond what I know now? Actually it's the worst fallacy to imagine that there's nothing beyond what I have experienced, and realized, nothing true beyond what I have, by chance and circumstances, experienced in this life.
I hope this wasn't too long, but - anyway, I submit that there is meaning, that it is rare, and valuable, which is something similar to, but not the same as, self-realization. The meaning of life is something along the lines of other universal, self-truths, which exist. I guess the main universal is that non-injuring living beings is good.