Ehehe, it's ok. ;)
Printable View
http://www.drellenrudolph.com/featur...s/platypus.jpg
here's another one :)
I've got a pewter platypus figure on my bookshelf at home
Awwwww, these animals are just so incredibly cute!! :) :) :)
The only thing that bothers me is that their 'beak' or snout would not be that pleasant to kiss (I like kissing my dog on the nose :p ). So I guess I would have to kiss my platypus on the forehead instead. Would still be cute. I've seen that their 'beak' is flexible, that's cute too.
lote...i think you should seek help for your lancing addiction lol jk.. :D you always seem to find someone that you wish to lance eh? one might take you as unfriendly if you are not carefull always picking the battle...lol :D
....................i bet 20 on lote................... jk jk jk
I'm ready to be second and referee. And I must say, Sir Lote, choosing the weapon yourself is rather un-knightly. As you are the challenger, your opponent may choose the weapon.
Well Prince, it's water-pistols, pea-pistols or plastic daggers. What do you choose?
about platypuses . . . when I was like 8 years old, I thought they were really cool since they are mammals but still lay eggs. To an 8-year-old obsessed with animals, that was something really exciting! I haven't thought much about them since then. ;)
Platypuses are realllly cute..just like penguins...and bunnies.
Am I the only one that thinks platypuses are incredibly ugly? Look at those horrid feet, ugh:sick: .
At the same time I think they're really fascinating, you know, the whole mammals that lay eggs thing.
Ah Lady Guinevere...Sure :D
But I am Sir Lance-Lote - the lance is an extenstion of myself :DQuote:
And I must say, Sir Lote, choosing the weapon yourself is rather un-knightly.
He is the challenger! I am the real Lote-Tree :DQuote:
As you are the challenger, your opponent may choose the weapon.
Yes, I do.
There is another thing as yet unmentioned about those feet that makes the "They are cute animals, I want one as a pet." option less attractive: They have poisonous spurs!
So there you have it: Don't pet them... Did you notice just how the keeper is holding the platypus in the pictures in the beginning of this thread? Looks a bit awkward, doesn't it? Now you know why.Quote:
Adult males have a pointed spur (about 15 millimetres long) located just above the heel of each hind leg, which can be used to inject poison produced by a gland in the thigh (the crural gland).
If provoked, a male platypus can use his spurs as a defensive weapon. In the days when platypus were shot for their fur, dogs were sometimes killed after being sent to retrieve a wounded male from the water. These days, people mainly get spurred when they handle a platypus which has become hooked inadvertently on a fishing line.
Platypus venom is not considered to be life-threatening to a healthy human. However, spurring is painful - in part, because platypus spurs are sharp and can be driven in with great force. As well, platypus poison triggers severe pain in the affected limb and can result in quite spectacular localised swelling.
Added in edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Diplomatic Platypus by Patrick Barrington
/Claes
The whole concept of keeping any animals as pets is disturbing to me, like a cruel form of long term torture. Imagine, if a man found a woman 'cute', would it be okay to divorce her from what would be her natural environment, her environment of choice, and keep her, effectively, a prisoner without any chance of self-determination, choice or will for the rest of her life, and foist kisses and other such affections on her as though this makes up for the act of subjugation.
I wonder, if it was acceptable or normal to act towards other humans in this way, would we continue to do so in relation to animals? Is it just another expression of our desire to have dominion over something else, albeit largely well intentioned? If dogs could speak would they say 'let me be a dog'?
I say, if you love them set them free. (or perhaps Sting might have said it, but if he did I agree!)
I agree with what you say here. Though, about dogs, I am certainly not part of those who want to dominate their dog. I have never considered myself as my dog's master, we are equals, and I would say that in some ways I actually still have a lot to learn from him.
His company, friendship and love are such an important part of my life. I am trying to make him as happy as he makes me. I know there is a part of selfishness in keeping an animal, I think you're right. But, without everything my dogs have shared with me, I would certainly not be the same person today. I owe them so much.
I wonder if dogs would like to be left alone, living their doggy life. Maybe. When I wander in the countryside with my dog, I try to give him all the time he wants to sniff whatever he feels like sniffing, I let him decide and I am happy with wherever he goes. I think he is happy with me. I feel it in the way he comes to my arms, snuggles up with me and falls asleep on my lap.
Now, I gues the situation with dogs is different from the situation with wild animals. I know I would feel guilty to take a wild animal as a pet.