:banana: Well I guess we'll see, won't we now? :banana:
Printable View
:banana: Well I guess we'll see, won't we now? :banana:
lol lol lol, you will win but at leat I'll soften his heart on me,one score:p! he can't help it:D:D
:nod: He'll probably see this thread and think to himself, "What weirdos." :lol:
I wish you the best of luck anyway! :thumbs_up :D
Hmmph :p -- in that case, I'd probably have a crush on Kathy, but I'm too young and have a girlfriend, and Lizzy wouldn't approve, besides. :p
Forget about him, you are too good for him....:D try to reason it out ;)
Hey, I'm availiable, I think?:D
See, ShoutGrace? See what you made poor Subby do?
No, no, no! A crush isn't the same as undying devotion, don't forget that! :bawling: :bawling:
In addition, while it can be determined that Kathy's avatar is more attractive than your avatar, it actually doesn't bear any aesthetic comparision to the real life you! You are far more sense and rational thought inhibiting. And that isn't some unfounded argument stemming from my wild enthrallment of you; there are specific evidences all over this forum!! (well, I think almost entirely in the General Chat section, actually.)
Okay, allright, I get it, lets all have a laugh because the tables have turned. :D But look, here's the difference: It's obvious that you, my dear subterranean, are too good for me - I'm fine with that. But I will work to level the playing field (admittedly in vain) whereas those puff brains that thevintagepiper was talking about were only about quick gains.
This still leaves the question of your current forum crush unnattended to! :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by subterranean
There is still hope for me. :nod:
See, this is were subterranean needs to refocus her time frame a little bit, I believe. This little hiccup doesn't compare to the vast body of evidence which bespeaks my utter infatuation with, and affection to, her.
Evidence #1 (posts 3384 through 3433 please).
Evidence #2 (posts 228 through 279 please).
If it please the court, I would also request that it be noted that these evidences partly illuminate the reasons why I am on "Pam" thread restrictions.
In short: YOU HAVE A CRUSH ON SUB.......:D :D
you admitted finally!!!! ;)
you could have said it in one line.........
First it was on kathy, then sub. Now, I wonder who? Madhuri? ;)Quote:
In short: YOU HAVE A CRUSH ON SUB.......
you admitted finally!!!!
you could have said it in one line.........
You are funny, guys :lol: