Hi again uranderson, Yes, truly I did for a year or maybe one semester. He was a really cool guy, very nice and down to earth. I think he was pretty young, since I added up his birthday and mine and he would just be about 16 yrs older than I am, so he would have been about 36 when he taught at PCA, which has since turned into University of the Arts. I learned a lot in his class and appreciated poetry more from the classroom stimulation. It was one of my favorite classes besides art studio classes.
Yes, you know I thought he was one of the editors - thanks for refreshing my memory. I know that book is still popular and used for teaching purposes. It is a great book and even though mine is in tatters I will keep it forever. NO, I was not in an MFA program....never pursued it that far. I received my BFA in Illustration - long story concerning a career in the field. I posted some of my artwork online if you would be interested in seeing it. I do pencil, colored pencil, mixed media with pencil and colored flat grounds and detailed ink (dot pattern style). The English and poetry classes I had were strickly required since my college gave a degree...some art schools do not. I enjoyed Berg's class. I am glad I have not lost my memory that badly and recalled his name. He was a nice guy like I said. Most students liked him a lot. His poetry was good and I wonder what ever happened to him.Quote:
That's really cool. He was one of the editors too? It really is one of the finest poetry anthologies in existence in my opinion. Were you in an MFA program or something? I was lucky enough to get a couple courses with Carolyn Forche at George Mason several years ago. Have you read her? She reminds me a lot of Levertov. The Country Between Us is her classic. I can provide links to some of my favorites if you haven't.
Funny, after I found him online I searched for my illustration teachers and came up with two of them. One, my favorite, is dean of the college now or maybe he is assistent dean and dean of another art school. Yikes, these guys must be pretty old by now! Is Stephen Berg still alive? - I certainly hope so. Shamefully, I have not read much of his work, but never too late. I am not at all familiar with Carolyn Forche. I will have to look up some of her work, if she is similar to Levertov. Sure, thanks, send me the links to her work. I love discovering someone new. In college and after I read a lot of Levertov, but I think I only touched minimally on her massive body of work. What I read struck me always as simple, but not simple - as you said layered. I guess I mean 'simple' in that the words were not difficult or of need of constant checking a dictionary for meaning. I liked her simplistic style and her directness and I always read the last line and said to myself - wow. It just struck a cord with me, and her writing seemed to me to seem very natural and never forced.
Yes, I agree completely - this is what seemed to attract me to her writing. Glad you liked the poem. Thrilled I found it at long last. She does command the use of metaphor exquisitely. I like the way in this poem I posted the last stanza directs the reader to a new idea on the though of 'invading'. Some people do 'invade' our very souls and they change us forever. I think when I read this first time, it was the right time for me - someone significant had invaded my being and my soul and left me feeling exactly as the poem states in the last few lines. I have though of this poem for years. Amazing how the essense of it stayed with me. I think, too, it will mean different things or conjure up different images to different people. That is what I liked about it, as well.Quote:
I did like that Levertov poem, it's typical of her, multiple layers of meaning (implied in part by line breaks, like the line "I love" which seems almost like a meaningful declarative statement in its own right), and skilled use of metaphor.
No, even though you are groggy - I know the feeling well - you really make a world of sense to me here. You stated this so well and I commend you. I quite agree with what you say and it gives me some new ideas on her work.Quote:
Possibly what I like most about her is her turning away from abstractions, analyses, and other forms of codified or rigid thought/behavior and moving toward a more organic, animalistic (in the best sense of the word) way of approaching life, love and art. This major theme in her work is represented well by this poem, I think the second half is in part a statement of that shifting worldview (sorry, it's not the best explanation of what I mean, but it's late and I'm groggy :))
Definitely and exactly as life is. Can we ever figure it all out? I liked the bit of obscurity and enigma in her writing. I liked to interpret the imagery and the idea to suit my own person feelings, at the time I absorb the words. Her poetry seems to allow for this.Quote:
Of course it's not that simple, her best poems are strong enough to resist that kind of simplistic, "A" means "B", explanation, instead suggesting alternate possibilities of meaning with successive readings. Similar to the way life is, I guess.

