There you go, it fooled me. I see now that you can use the light from a TV to create some interesting photography.
Printable View
There you go, it fooled me. I see now that you can use the light from a TV to create some interesting photography.
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1625/...e388086e_c.jpg
My brother (left) and dad getting a taste of the first ham out of the recently finished food smoker, basically a wood-heated sauna stove with a cabinet on top.
Thanks, I'm really attracted to the surreal. I like landscapes, and they are easier to conceptualize - but my favourite photographers/photos are surreal or unusual. Ideally, psychological. diane arbus, gregory crewdson, todd hidoQuote:
Originally Posted by Dreamwoven
Interesting. I think I have an inkling of what you mean by psychological here, Tony, but I'm not sure. Something where the photograph shows people or something affected by people, or perhaps evidence of the lack of people's influence. Trouble is, though, that just about all photographs can fit under that description. Not all realize that, though, and that can make a difference in the photographs.Quote:
Originally Posted by tonywalt
True, true.Quote:
Originally Posted by North Star
Great stuff, guys. These next two, taken at sunrise out front, you might call my Dawn of Creation series.
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1560/...a4e7c467_c.jpg[url=https://flic.kr/p/FwCqQc]Dawn of Creation, on Flickr
And there's always psychology involved in the making of a photograph, as well as in seeing one, by definition. This sunlit daytime scene didn't quite look like this to the naked eyes, for instance.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5527/...ef061cc9_h.jpg
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1707/...367acce3_c.jpg[url=https://flic.kr/p/Ez4PaB]Dawn of Creation 2, on Flickr
Lovely photos, Tyrion, wonderful light. I'm always a sucker for those layers of shadows with different tones in landscapes. That green dot in the road is quite a strange looking artifact indeed.
What is that green dot? It seems too circular to be in the road. I couldn't enlarge it in flickr to see it closer.
You know what, lads? I think we have our very first paranormal photo anomaly on old LitNet. If Art Bell hadn't retired for the forty-third time, I'd call him up. Clearly it's otherworldly, an automated signal beacon from an old alien ship (extra-dimensional, of course), whose crew died long ages ago, and which has been drifting, signaling into the darkness ever since. Then again it could be a really small, circular ghost. Or part of one. Or there's a portal in my driveway that I never noticed before, and if I'm not careful, me and my Honda are likely to slip through into the land of fae, where cruel and whimsical nature spirits in the service of the White Queen will have their way with me. And my car.
That stac, buffeted by waves in Tonywalt's picture looks as if it has the texture of a sponge.
How can you past a picture directly from the PC on the post? So far I managed to post only links with images on Litnet, but not the images themselves.
There is a way to put a picture on the site and then link to it. I go a round-about way of taking the photo from Google and then putting it in an anonymous Photobucket site. I don't know if that is worth bothering doing any more. Perhaps just a link to a shared picture on Google is adequate. I don't know what the best solution is. Ideally I would like some folder in Google for pictures that I make public.