I'm nominating "Categories" by Aristotle.
Alright, the nominees so far are:
The Apology by Socrates
Categories by Aristotle
The Present Age by Kierkegaard
Any others?
Printable View
I'm nominating "Categories" by Aristotle.
Alright, the nominees so far are:
The Apology by Socrates
Categories by Aristotle
The Present Age by Kierkegaard
Any others?
I'd like to nominate The Analects (as mentioned by Comedian). It'd be nice to read something from the Eastern philosophical tradition.
I would like to nominate 'Tao Te Ching' by Lao Tzu.. It's fairly small in quantity and I think majority of Chinese philosophy is based on it. I once read it and has some (many actually) doubts that I would love to discuss and resolve with other fellow members!Quote:
Originally Posted by Drkshadow03
Also I would like to nominate, Swami Vivekananda and Jiddu Krishnamurthy... for Indian Philosophy!
I'm going to change my vote to The Consolations of Philosophy by Boethius actually. So we have:
The Apology by Socrates
The Consolations of Philosophy by Boethius
The Present Age by Kierkegaard
The Analects by Confucius
Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu
That is five nominees. I am going to say we should keep it to one nominee per a person.* I also think if the philosophy club takes off we should only allow people who participated in the previous discussion to nominate.
Let's vote on Saturday! I'll create a separate poll thread, voting will last for one week, and then we'll read and discuss whatever wins. Sound good to everyone?
*Krishna, if you would prefer one of those Indian philosophers as your nominees instead Lao Tzu, just let me know, and I will replace your one nominee with one of the other ones. But let's keep it to one per a person.
Hmm.. That doesn't sound very good, I mean, may be we would inspire new people with our discussions, but then if we don't allow them to participate, that would completely oppose the prime motto of Philosophy itself, the freedom!Quote:
Originally Posted by Drkshadow03
Yes voting is fine.. Sound good to me!Quote:
Let's vote on Saturday! I'll create a separate poll thread, voting will last for one week, and then we'll read and discuss whatever wins. Sound good to everyone?
I'm completely fine with Lao Tzu as my nomination.. Thanks :)Quote:
*Krishna, if you would prefer one of those Indian philosophers as your nominees instead Lao Tzu, just let me know, and I will replace your one nominee with one of the other ones. But let's keep it to one per a person.
Which previous discussion? Does this mean I'm disqualified? I would certainly enjoy joining a philosophy book club, beginning with any of the 5 nominations you've listed!Quote:
Originally Posted by Drkshadow03
I was thinking more like once we get started, if you want to nominate for the NEXT book you would have to have participated in the most recent discussion (which doesn't exist yet since we haven't had any discussions yet). That way if people want to nominate the next book they will be required to have participated in the previous discussion. We don't have to do this if people are opposed.
I've just been in a lot of book clubs on this forum where the discussion fizzled out and the club died. Bible book club/the poetry book club (where like only two of us ended up participating). I would really like there to be a philosophy book club that has genuine discussion with in depth discussion with multiple people who actually read the book.
It's Saturday today, so let's have take the voting, then??
Ah, gotcha! I will typically only vote if I really plan to commit to it (same with the general literature forum).Quote:
Originally Posted by Drkshadow03
Thanks!