Originally Posted by
MarkBastable
I do. And it's actually, at the editorial level, quite sane. A balance between the commerical and the creative. It's down to the predisposition of the most influential editors.
True. But the people who are doing well out of the swing of the pendulum one way are unlikely to invest in a swing the other way. Look, for instance, at how the major record companies fought, at first, against the rise of punk.
Self-publishing is not punk, I'm afraid. The dynamics are just not viable, even if the product is top class. That's not where the paradigm shift will be forced.
But - I agree with you in principle. It'd be nice to believe that something will happen to seriously worry - for which read commercially terrify - the majors.
Then again, if my agent gets me a deal with Random House next year, I'm likely to stop worrying about this.