I'd like to think that I would but don't know, depends on circumstances.
same question
Printable View
I'd like to think that I would but don't know, depends on circumstances.
same question
Depends whether the aggressor has a gun or other form of weapon, I maybe daft, but I'm not stupid, and I rather prefer staying alive.
Stayin' alive.
Stayin' alive.
Ah, ha, ha, ha,
Stayin' alive.
(by the beegees) :D
Would you jump into a river when you are standing on a bridge, just for the fun of it?
No.
Would you if you didn't know how deep it was?
No, If I know how deep it is I still wouldn't, unless I knew it was deep enough, and there didn't happen to be a big ship under the bridge. Even then, I'd only do it on an average bridge, not a really big bridge.
Would you cry FREEDOM when you are being disembowled?
I ain't Mel Gibson, so no.
Would you want to be in Mel's shackles while being disembowled?
Nah, I prefer to do the disembowling myself.
Would you drive a firetruck to the river and play cops and robbers with it?
Cops and robbers with a firetruck? Like play the robber and steal the truck and have some cops chase me all around the brindge? No, firetrucks are too heavy for a proper chase :cool:
Would you bungee off a bridge?
Sure, but it had better be a high bridge, and the bungee has to be of the correct length.
Would you do something out of the ordinary in an ordinary situation to make the situation a bit less ordinary?
That depends on the ordinary situation, too vague :p
Would you now?
I'm a little out of the ordinary, except when I'm in an ordinary situation, that's when I become a very ordinary person, so I don't do anything out of the ordinary to make ordinary situations a little less ordinary, but it all depends on what is ordinary.
would you describe what you think is an ordinary situation?
Nope :p
Would you prefer to indulge in being present at ordinary situations or the less ordinary ones?
dunno, less ordinary sounds a little less ordinary, so I think the less ordinary isn't so ordinary, and as such more interesting then the ordinary situations.
Would you go to the top of the mountain, place a stick in the ground, and climb down again?
You mean like on Mount Everest, the old, "Just because it's there." sort of thing? No. I've climbed the tallest mountain in our state, but not because it's there. I love nature. There are animals and plants up there that exist nowhere else. I'm glad to have seen them. What is there to see on Everest except snow and ice? I'm sure the thrill of standing on the top of the world is exhilarating, but you snap a few pictures and get down from there before you freeze off various parts of your anatomy. Me for the nature, to tack a deer for a close-up picture, actually hold a lizard or snake, see wildflowers that a very rare. That's my idea of a mountain climb. And there's rock faces for the danger minded.
Would you hold a (non-poisonous) snake?
Indeed, and I have before. Having cousins in the countryside, and seeming like a curious child, I had all sorts of daring experiences with animals; and I visited the Portland Zoo quite a bit, too, where they would have showcases of certain animals.
To the person below me: if you suddenly earned or inherited a very large sum of money (more than you would ever need), would you flaunt much with what you have and spend lots (such as purchasing a mansion, for example), or purchase what more seems needed, and store the rest of the finances?
I'd buy a 1964 Lincoln Continental with suicide doors and a 460 engine. Then I'd throw the rest of the money in the trunk for buying gasoline.
Would you cash in your wimpy paycheck for a train ticket to Churchill, Manatoba to see the Polar Bear migration?