"The Invention of Lying": 8/10 Kitkats.
Rather entertaining movie with an interesting theme (a world where nobody lies) and many famous names making appearances made this a worthwhile viewing for me.
Printable View
"The Invention of Lying": 8/10 Kitkats.
Rather entertaining movie with an interesting theme (a world where nobody lies) and many famous names making appearances made this a worthwhile viewing for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Comedian
Even with that cute Robert Downey Jr.???
Breach - 7/10
Got this DVD from the library. It's based on the Robert Hanssen security breach and is a pretty interesting look at the inner workings of the FBI.
The Interpreter gets a solid 9.5/10 from me; it's about three of my favorite things: violence in Africa, interpreters and the UN.
:rolleyes: Yep even with that shirtless, crime-solving cutie at the lead. It's hard to make crap cute. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by papayahed
Say it ain't so...Quote:
Originally Posted by The Comedian
I really enjoyed that movie. Would give it a 8/10.Watched the movie?Quote:
Originally Posted by Papayahed
If not, you *have to* :smilewinkgrin:
Not yet but it's on my netflix list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheherazade
You might want to take it off your list and get something that actually has a story.Quote:
Originally Posted by papayahed
Is it not good? **expletive** I was looking forward to that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Haunted
now that I think about it, there was a 3-minute long story...Quote:
Originally Posted by BienvenuJDC
the new Sherlock Holmes — my rating 0.3/10
The Watchmen....
and absolute waste of time, unless you want politically biased propaganda.
I didn't even finish watching it...
0/10
Beware of a Holy Whore directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder. An easy 10/10!
That's the best kind of propaganda. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by BienvenuJDC
I had issues with Watchmen, but enjoyed the theater experience for the most part. I haven't seen or thought of it since, much like The Dark Knight.
My Dinner With Andre - Undoubtedly one of the best films of the 80's. Independent and experimental filmmaking at the highest and most simple order. A two-hour conversation between two men; one being one of the most fascinating you could ever meet, another, an uncanny reflection of yourself. It's simply that. Two men have a conversation at a restaurant concerning the the theater, modern mysticism and the nature of life and death throughout the length of a two hour movie. It is an amazing achievement in its ability to not only hold our attention, but to actually put us into the conversation. My mind usually tends to wander off, even during great movies to even important things, such as the quality of the directing, the acting, the script. But with this film I was totally enveloped into it. It is minimalist filmmaking at its very best for it is able to flash back and forth between two talking-heads for two-hours and have us utterly entranced.
I haven't even gotten to the ideas described in the film, and my God there's so many of them and discussed so wonderfully and naturally, which do not exactly purpose to change your whole way of thinking about the world, but leave you moved in the way one would be when engaging in a long conversation with another person. It is utterly mesmerizing. Please, stop watching Transformers and take some time to think about your life and reality, this is an important film. 10/10
The new Sherlock Holmes. It was OK. I just couldn't get too interested. 3/10
Alice in Wonderland (not in 3-D) Visually very interesting, but all the characters seemed so vaccuous. The Red Queen played by Helena Bonham Carter was the only one that had some spunk. The White Queen played by Anne Hathaway was in a complete stupor most of the time. She seemed fascinated with her hand, probably wondering what it was dangling from her wrist. I cannot begin to explain why anyone would want her leading a nation.
And can anyone explain why Tim Burton added a scene where Alice's brother-in-law was being unfaithful to his wife by kissing another girl? What was the point of that?
The two characters I liked the most, and they were both animated were the Cheshire cat and the Caterpillar. I think Alan Rickman did the voices for both.
My rating 5/10
I'd give it about a 6/10 for storyline etc, but the 3D... See it in 3D - I did and it definately went up to bout an 8/10 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lynne50
I enjoyed the new Sherlock Holmes - I like mysteries, and it's hard to do a film mystery that's compelling more than once with an ensemble of potential villains, so I suspect that having the villain be apparent from the beginning was arguably one of the most sensible approaches to take. Granted, there are elements of predictability, but I feel the film gets points for being well-acted, well-researched, and well-scored (in my opinion). 8/10.
The actual last movie I saw in theatres was Date Night, with Steve Carell and Tina Fey. A legitimate way to kill some time - not a particularly unique movie, but not the mindless date drivel the title might suggest. It's closer to a screwball comedy than a chick flick. 5/10.
District 9 --
Really, really liked it 8/10. How did this movie not get more acclaim last year? Well, maybe it did; I'm so out of the loop with this stuff. But if you want a unique sci-fi story that is well worth your time, check out this movie.
!!!!!! The novel is much better; it's even more political. :lol: But seriously, I can totally understand that someone going into Watchmen looking for a traditional superhero story (like Iron Man) would be disappointed. Watchmen is political, sexualized, polemic. . .yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by BienvenuJDC
The Battle of Algiers. 10/10
Fight Club - Rimbaud (litnet member, not writer lol) has been demanding that I watch this film forever. Now I have. Here's to you Rimbaud.
It is not very often that big-budget mainstream films are allowed or even dare to be as daring, stylish, violent and yes, outrageous as Fight Club. This film has influenced a whole decade of mainstream films. From Wanted to Secret Window to Saw, and yet it stands high above all of the rest of the copycats.
Fincher's style is extravigant, stylish and proudly show-off all of the money spent on the visual effects. And yet it works. Some of the images in this film have become semi-iconic and with good reason. Very few films in the 90's had as great an atmosphere as Fight Club. We open the film and there's an unnamed narrator who suffers from insomia, he's at work, the office mechanically moves around. And then on the screen for about half a second something flashes. It doesn't entirely matter what it is, but it tells the viewer that this is no ordinary film and that its level of subjectivity is to be great.
Hell just the begining premise would make a great film; the narrator, so detached from life and humanity that he cannot sleep, begins frequenting help-centers for people with diseases and pose as one of the many crying men with diseases like testicular cancer. These early scenes are cruelly and darkly funny. We see a man with giant breasts crying over the fact that he had his testicals cut off. This is terrible and yet it is a helplessly funny situation for the narrator.
These early scenes present a sense of brauva black comedy which is both daring, funny and heartless all at the same time.
Then Brad Pitt comes along and serves as a kind of bad-*** philosopher for our narrator who has sunk so low as to be faking to be a dying man just so that he can feel something. Pitt's ideas start off as somewhere between Nietzsche and Baudrillard but then as the movie progresses go into disturbing places to somewhere like the society Orwell presented in Animal Farm. In fact, I'm about certain that many of the scenes in the latter half of the film are hommages to Animal Farm.
Because Fincher is a director with such respect for detail and atmosphere, we (or at least me) are carried all the way through and begin to believe the more outrageous the story gets the more funny it is. And it is true. There seems to be a consistent undertone of balls being cut off and there is this one pay-off scene well near the climax in which the film is at its darkest point and yet provides a very weird and very hilarious comic relief that isn't really relief but just makes you more anxious and confused (this is not entirely a negative thing).
And then there are the fighting scenes which boarder on macho porn (to use Ebert's term). They are brutal and bloody and yet also liberating. The men go out and knock the **** out of each other, the others cheer on, and then they hug after being all bloodied up. The level of instinct and collective emotion is comparable to a daily religious experience for the men.
Pitt's character begins as a rebellious and yet inspiring character, despite his own pathology and masochism. His soliloquey's criticizing consumerist society (no matter how constructed the speeches might feel) are right on target. It is only once Fincher seems to purposely drive Pitt beyond the pale does he become alienating for both the viewer and the narrator.
A lot of the films works. The beginning undoubtedly. The fight scenes, yes. The scenes when Pitt and Norton (the narrator) live together in what is undertoned as a homoerotic relationship also with some Oedipal tones, yes. Even as the film becomes much darker and themes of Stalinist communism begin to come into play, yes if you want. But there is one surprise near the end, a twist, that just had me thinking "say it ain't so Joe".
After that point the film inter-changed between a brilliant practice in surrealist humour and just plain silly. Now like I said, Fincher is above making a truly silly and outrageous film and Fight Club is so original that to call it silly or outrageous is undeserved, but it is certainly not a perfect film. Fight Club no matter what its flaws is above all an experience. 7/10
*Suggestion for first-time viewers of this film: View this film as a very serious film on the edge of total comedy.
I have to watch all the new rentals that come out because of my job. Here's what I had this week:
Peacock - 4/10. It was filmed well, but by the end it honestly creeped me out.
The Lovely Bones - 5/10. They glossed right over the whole "brutal rape" part, which I've always thought is a slap in the face to rape victims. They didn't follow her sister very much, and the script was pretty cliche and sappy. Her heaven was pretty though... very liquid.
New York, I Love You - 6/10. This one is hard to rate, because it was a film of about twelve stories that took place in New York and a couple of them were quite good, a couple sucked, and the rest were in the middle. Out of all of the ones that I watched this week, this one was the only one worth watching.
Including the ones that go in the vault?? :eek2:Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperWoolf
Omg serious?!?!? YOU have the GREATEST job in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperWoolf
^Seconded. I'm jealous.
Haha, no but my manager does because he has to make sure that there's nothing illegal on them (he's found quite a bit of bestiality, actually).Quote:
Originally Posted by Basil
And yeah, my job is sweet. :p
All porn in Canada is supposed to have that little sticker that says it's been approved by the censors. Because Canadian law forbids bestiality, pedophilia, simulated rape, and violence in porn.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperWoolf
My brother used to work for a distributor here in Montreal and it was a big hassle for all the porn produced in the US to be approved for sale in Canada.
Omg I seriously thought that you had said "he's quite fond of bestiality" so I was like WTF?!Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperWoolf
:lol:
I'm trying to discipline myself by keeping my reivews brief. Here it goes:
World's Greatest Dad - My sister was watching this, I saw Robin Williams in it and despite the fact that I am a great fan of his stand-up comedic work, one out of every five films he's done I've disliked (yes Mrs.Doubtfire is totally one of them). That said, he has a magnificent edge for dark comedies and this film is perfect for him, as he has proven himself on those uncommon but special occasions to be just as good a comedic actor as a dramatic one.
Despite the misleading and unlikable title, this mercilessly dark satire about a divorced father who lives with his distinctively child-from-hell teenager son who is (even for a fifteen year old) grossly obsessed with sex and is a compulsive erotic asphyxiate.
I must first give a great bravo to Daryl Sabara who plays the piece of **** son with an intensity and disturbingness rarely seen in mainstream films. This kid clearly has major problems, as evidenced by his semi-sociopathy, his utter misogyny among many things.
But everything changes when the father finds his son dead as a result of accidental suffocation while masturbating, the father out of shame of people knowing the perversity of his son, discards of all of the evidence to make it look like a suicide and from then on literatley re-creates the memory of his son into a lonley, confused and yet greatly intelligent young man.
From this point on the film goes into a dark satire on not only our obsessions with the memories of the deceased, but also our willingness to project the ideal unto reality.
The film has the potential for a truly great film but meanders here and there, making unnecessary moments to the point that by the end of the film everything seems too lopsided. Indeed it has moments of a true gem, but the disturbing realism of the first half is contrasted too heavily with the satire of the second and comes out uneven.
Both ways this is a fine film, deserving to be seen merely for the first act. 7/10
Barry Lyndon - The best three hours you can spend at the movies. A great and unique film by Stanley Kubrick which is as eloquently satirical as it is sad and sublime. A poetic masterpiece that flows like music and the picturesque images presented in just about every shot. 10/10
I just got home from watching a Canadian independent film about LARPing called Wild Hunt. It was a pretty decent movie, an interesting premise and I enjoyed it. The movie will probably be seen by only a handful of people though lol.
Damnation - This is as terrifying and dark a film about modern industrial life as ever I did see. Its merciless and grotesque landscape replicates nothing less than a Dantesque Hell. Dreary and desolate the landscape it. Almost every shot of this film is filled with an atmosphere of the hopelessness. And yet there live people under this fog and music too. It is all the more terrifying. There is a certain scene in this film in which two of its main chatacters are making love to the background of the noise of industry, and it is as grotesque and mechanical a sex scene as ever I have seen.
Tarr's camera slowly pans the texture of this hell. All seem to be stuck there, as if in an endless time continuum. Dogs wander the streets, scavengers for scraps of food. But worse, men sit and discover how empty the time is.
Under this physical landscape is something much worse and more nihilistic. It's main character Karrer, obsessed with memories of his past lover, gradually comes to the realization of how empty his life and everything around him is.
There is a certain scene here in which a man tap dances in a puddle of water. This isn't joy, it is as terrifying a mechanicality as the factory machines. 9/10
Now on a lighter note I am going to examine two recent mainstream comedies and examine why one works and one doesn't.
Pinnapple Express - Okay this film has every reason not to work. It's immature, has a lot of action scenes, is ridiculously absurd and is pretty much all about two stoners freaking out as they run away from a bunch of drug lords. Not only that but it is also one of the funniest comedies I've seen for a long time. James Franco's performance is pitch perfect as the one of the stoners (who's also a pot dealer) and the script which indulges in Beckettian digression constantly, makes use of the most immature, absurd and obscene situations and makes them totally ****ing hilarious. 8.5/10
Step Brothers - I'm willing to submit and say that Pineapple Express most likely has just as much violence and obscene language (though definitley not drug content, that's for sure lol) as Step Brothers, and yet one of them is deemed to be a classic while another is somewhere next to an utterly depressing experience.
So what is it that makes Step Brothers different from the brilliance of Pineapple Express? Well it's not that the word "****" is said hundreds of times in both movies, but because one of them was approached and done in a well thought-out and funny way. The script of Step Brothers pretty much just sounds like a bunch of wildly immature men got together and wrote down as many obscenities as they could and put them into violent situations.
It's hard to explain without having seen the movies side by side but because of the context and situation that memorable phrases from Pineapple Express like "it smells like God's vagina" or "you're as high as a ****ing kite" which make them so funny. Step Brothers just throws pointless and unfunny stuff at you that may be amusing to a twelve year old and that's about it. That said Step Brothers does have its laugh out loud moments (the scene when they make a bunk-bed) but other than that it is nothing more than a cruel and mean-spirited comedy. 3/10
Being John Malkovitch - My God, Charlie Kauffman I think has very well proven himself to be the first writer auteur we've had in a long time. Never before have so many films have so consistently had so much in common even if they were directed by different people, because in reality all of these great films are Kauffman films.
Being John Malkovitch is Kauffman's first success and is a moving, absurd, funny, sad, weird and beautiful film about three lonely souls whose lives are changed once they find a portal into the head of John Malkovitch in a filing room where they work on the 7 1/2 floor. Soon enough they start a business selling 15 minutes into Malkovitch's brain for $200.
This movie has so many brilliant ideas which come in layer after layer, though despite that, it is never overwhelming.
What this film is about is our sense of a longing for completeness, for otherness, for love and for eternity. What many of the characters do in this film are terribly wrong, but in some very absurd way in this alternate universe we can understand their human needs. There is a great performance in here by Cameron Diaz (with an exceptionally modest physical appearence) who discovers that she wants to be a transexual after discovering what it is like to have sex with a woman whilst inside Malkovitch's head. The scene of this realization (filmed almost entirely through the POV of Malkovitch/Diaz) is frankly the most beautiful, weird and moving of the whole film.
Then there's Malkovitch himself who took considerable guts to star in the film, with even more guts by Kauffman to write a script about people traveling inside a renouned actor's head.
Kauffman is truly the wonder-boy of today's cinema. His films are beyond description. They can be deleriously funny and sad in the very same moments, fantastical and yet truthful, satirical and yet moving. And more than anything, Kauffman is a philosopher of the human spirit. 9.5/10
For some reason I haven't seen Being John Malkovitch although I used to love him back in the day when he made movies fairly frequently and he was so-o-o-o good at being the bad guy.
Crazy Heart 9/10 This movie doesn't really cover any new ground, but then as they say, there is only one story.
And this one is magnificent. Jeff Bridges earned his Oscar with every creaky joint and shot. He says he's 57, moves like he's 67. But when he gets onstage and holds his guitar you can hear every long night on the road, every bad decision, every phone call that isn't answered, every bottle that he's drunk in his voice.
Somehow, as greasy and unwashed and bleary as he is, women still want him. It was surprisingly believable when he lay back on the bed with Maggie Gyllenhal in his arms and he cupped her breast in his hand.
It was just as believable when he sat before her weeks later, his eyes little slits, looking small, deflated, cowed by life and a mother's fury.
If you are looking for a movie with an actual story to tell, one with sound and fury and even love, this is it. And it comes with songs that flow like the dark river. Here is one used in the movie, sung by the original rake-hell and wanderer, Townes Van Zandt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl41lqUFKS4
Reality Bites - eh 4/10
Before I even get started on this movie, I want to know what it is about Winona Ryder that makes her so unlikeable sometimes? She has been in several movies that I liked, but something about Winona Ryder has always been off to me. I've tried to like her - she's pretty enough, she's not a horrible actress and she always seemed to get good roles up until this movie, I think...so what is it about her? It must be the way she talks. I have never liked the sound of her voice.And, if someone other than Winona Ryder had played the lead in this movie, I still wouldn't have liked it I don't think.
Reality Bites is an old movie - it's from 1994 and I would have been a junior in high school at that time and I couldn't sit through this movie back then, even though I suspect that I might have been the target audience. So, why after all these years did I watch this film? Well, it was on cable and I was too exhausted to do anything but watch crappy TV apparently.
The story is about some young people living their post-college lives in the 1990's. Winona Ryder's character was the valedictorian of her graduating class and she has a bad haircut, wears schleppy dresses, smokes a lot of cigarettes and doesn't find her dream job. She has this executive type, quasi-boyfriend played by Ben Stiller and a friendship that begs to be more with the sterotypical 90's grunge band member played by Ethen Hawke who lives in and out of her apartment that she shares with two other roomates (I'll get to those characters in a minute). The grungy band character is too intellectual to hold a job and he slips his dirty laundry in with theirs in between band rehearsals . Her other roommates consist of a gay blonde male in gold- rimmed glasses played by Steve Zahn I think (Strange Wilderness was a much better movie than this) and an unhappy chain-smoking 90's female with pale skin, black hair and hideously short, unattractive bangs who works at the Gap and also wears ugly, schleppy dresses.
Now, I am sure there is more going on in this film then what these characters are wearing. I think this film attempts to make a statement about that generation, Generation X I think it was...but all I saw were ugly clothes and bad haircuts. I think maybe the filmmakers could have done away with the plot and the dialogue all together. They could just condense this film into a series of still shots of these characters wearing those clothes in that apartment and they would have communicated the same idea in a shorter amount of time. If anyone wants to know about the 90's all they have to do is look at the clothes. And best of all, no one would have had to hear Winona Ryder's strange little voice.
Precious 9/10 Precious is the story of a girl who is physically and sexually abused. When the movie opens she has been called into the office at her school where the principal confronts her. Is she pregnant? Is she pregnant for the second time?
As the story progresses I think the most amazing thing was that there was anything left of Precious to save. She is sent to a new school where the power of education and a teacher who convinces her that she really cares are the saving of her.
I've seen a number of movies about teachers who turn students around. They are, for the most part good movies. And I admit I'm a sucker for the underdog. I liked this one because it tells the story from the students' viewpoint. For most of the movie Precious had precious little reason to wake up and be glad she was alive. Lee Daniels directs with a kind, sure hand. He shows the ugly stuff, but he never strips his main character of dignity or hope.
The Passion of Joan of Arc - Again, this is one of the most powerful films I have ever seen. Renée Jeanne Falconetti's performance is unquestionably the greatest in all of cinema. It doesn't matter if you are a person of faith or not, this is a film of impeccable quality. I hardly ever cry at films, and this film made me weep. Never will there be a moment ever again in cinema as when Joan remembers who taught her the Lord's prayer. 10/10
Tokyo Story - Ozu's films must always be watched twice. His films are so masterfully understated and subtle that a second viewing surely blows off the surface of contained emotions. Ozu is a master not only of composition but of storytelling. His films are like beautiful hakius, with a quiet lingering beauty. This film is as near-perfect as movies get. 10/10
Andrei Rublev - Very few films have ever stood amongst the epic heights of Tarkovsky's masterpiece. This film is in every respect a great film. No this is not a film of epic proportions, don't let the scope and length fool you. This is a film about moments, long and short, of the human experience. I couldn't agree with Bergman more when he said this after seeing this film, "Tarkovsky for me is the greatest [director], the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream." 10/10
Avatar -- Wow, was that movie slow, cheesy, and dumb. The dialogue must have been written by a 13 year old who once saw Dancing with Wolves only he was too stoned to really recall it, but, hey what if Indians were blue? And remember that one part in LOTR with those walkin' trees what were all magical and crap? Dude!
Seriously, how could this possibly have been nominated for an Oscar?
Why is it every time I watch a movie, I feel my time could have been better spent sitting on the potty and reading a magazine?
2/10
Dreamwork's How to Train Your Dragon. I loved it 5 stars!
Nine - For a musical about the Italian film industry (which I've never really given much thought to before), this was right up my alley. There were a couple of parts that I could watch over and over (I loved the redheaded prostitute, she was an earth goddess type). The protagonist was a self-indulgent cliché for most of the film, but that was the whole point. I could sift through this one for a while, I got a lot out of it and I will get more next time I see it. 8/10
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus - A film by Terry Gilliam, a director that I aaaalmost like, I start watching and it has potential, but then it gets all muddled and ruined about half way through. He just needs to slow down and understand the significance of subtlety. Remember that scene in Birth where they showed the widow's face in the theatre, trying not to have a complete mental breakdown? That's the genius of subtlety, something that Terry Gilliam's films are sorely lacking. It's all just way too over the top, it's too desperate and frantic. I did like some things though, I liked the young gypsy girl's style. She had a very interesting look. I also liked some of the visuals throughout the film, very pretty. So, in conclusion, this one looked good but wasn’t. 5/10
Ice Age: Dawn Of The Dinosours
10/10 I can't help it I love diago, and his voice is by Denis Leary one of my favorite actors, the only well known stand up ( other then henry rollins ) who talks about punk rock, plus I loved Rescue me and his music.
I also love that little squirl, and aww he fell in love, for a bit anyway lol.
And dinosours, ugh I love them, the mom t-rex was bad ***, and the kids were cute.
and the fact they through in that one giant dinasour as the big bad guy was awsome too, he's fairly new to our knowledge it wasnt long before jurassic park 3 that it was discovered. that made me happy.
and the little eggs that Sid had, that cracked me up.