I think Scheherazade is looking for a guy who looks like the first picture but who is also into advanced economics.
Printable View
When I was 14 other girls made fun of me because 'charm' (what ever that is) to me were men like Woody Allen and Steve Buschemi. Today it's more Simon Pegg maybe but always the nerdy or odd guys. NEVER Brad Pitt!!
I'll admit I had a Viggo Mortensen phase but that was around LOTR, and he DID look good on a horse.
I think guys are just as self conscious about their looks as many girls are and they think girls want someone with a six pack on their body but really they want a six pack in the fridge.
I think of it like the woman wants her man to be a beta before her but an alpha towards everyone else, just like a man wants his wife to be dirty with him but a prude towards all other guys. Its what I've noticed in my relationship experience. Fights happen when both act alpha towards the other and neither wants to be a beta.
This is why respect is so vital to a healthy relationship. If the man acts like a beta towards the rest of the world then his woman will act like an alpha ALL THE TIME, even when its just the two of them in private.
And if the man does not respect the woman in private, is alpha on her all the time, then her self-esteem will go down and the relationship will become poisonous for her.
Its a pain in the butt trying to navigate this horrendously complicated dating world. I prefer to abstain from it. Its the most stressful thing, dating, for me at least.
I actually agree that most women don't care too much about how much money a man makes. I know plenty of women who are in relationships with unemployed, alcoholic bums--goes into the whole "women date jerks" idea.
So looks don't matter at all, huh? You're above all that? Sure, Scher, sure you are. :rolleyes5:
I'm coming to believe that nothing matters at all: some women are just so gosh darned open minded they don't have any standards at all!
I don't get why there's all this backlash against the idea of women wanting to date an alpha-male, which, to me, doesn't mean the same thing as dating a jerk. Why wouldn't women want to be with the alpha male? Why are some arguing so vehemently that you'll go out with someone not on top of the metaphorical food chain? I think you'd be better of just saying, "You're right, Neely, we do go out with the alpha-males. Deal with it."
How about, 'We're complicated' instead?
On behalf of female population all over the world, thank you.
Sorry to disappoint, guys.
Scheherazade is not looking for anything or anyone anymore.
I am quite surprised that this issue is rather confusing to you. Is Brad Pitt goodlooking? Yes. Do I feel tempted to get to know someone looking like him? No. Unless he is carrying that promised Chemistry textbooks, that is.
You're wrong, MM. We do not go out with the alpha-males. Deal with it.I am not sure why this "superiority" angle is. All we are saying is that we find different things attractive.Quote:
I'm coming to believe that nothing matters at all: some women are just so gosh darned open minded they don't have any standards at all!
Seems like most men have a chip on their shoulders because they do not like Brad Pitt or is not as rich as Bill Gates.
Well, I think it's pretty stupid if you're not looking for an alpha male. Why would you want someone not attractive, not charismatic, and not successful? I admit it--I was *****ing before because I'm not those things.
Anyways, maybe you don't date alpha males, but you can't speak for all women, not matter how highly you value your own thoughts and opinions.
And you don't play the superior angle at all...
I don't have a chip on my shoulder for these reasons. I am just a little tired of the pretence of you 'women folk' at being attracted to more 'noble' attributes when the evidence, and common sense, seems to point otherwise. This is generally speaking of course, but still it is a bit silly, so come clean now.Quote:
Seems like most men have a chip on their shoulders because they do not like Brad Pitt or is not as rich as Bill Gates.
And anyway, I have been told that I look a little like Brad Pitt by two different people at different times. True, one of them was my friend and the other was drunk, but I'll take the compliment nonetheless. Also, who the hell wouldn't want Bill Gates' cash anyway or is this something that your sex don't like as well? Are you above money as well as looks?
Obviously not so highly to claim to know what men think or prefer better than they do... Nor to call their opinions "stupid".I'd strongly urge you to re-read my post. That comment was directed at those who label women as "fortune-hunters" or "trophy-wife wannabes".Quote:
And you don't play the superior angle at all...
I have no problem with people having money (inluding myself). It is just that it is not one of the things I would like to take into consideration while determining how "attractive" someone is (or not).
At this point, I don't think I have any more to say on this issue.
Have fun.
I don't even know what alpha male means in this day and age. When I hear the term I think of someone who's an obnoxious twat and needs to be brought down a peg or two. But then the term 'alpha male' itself seems to be nothing but a stereotype.
There exists many a guy who makes a respectable amount of income but does not rely on it to get dates, and someone who is attractive to look at but not 'metrosexual' and overbearing. This is obviously more people's ideal partner.
What about alpha females? Would anyone find them ideal partners? Women DO earn their own money these days and there's probably (since I still don't know what the term means) plenty of them around.