Originally Posted by
Antiquarian
I absolutely agree. Once consensual incest becomes legal, then it follows that consensual "anything" would become legal and with it, the breakdown of civilized society. People would say:
"We can murder one another in our group; it's consensual."
"We can take drugs in our group; it's consensual." (And never mind if, while taking those drugs, they harm others, who haven't consented.)
"We can conduct prostitution in our group; it's consensual." (But never mind if one person contracts AIDS or another STD and then subsequently leaves the group and passes it on to an innocent person who never even heard of the "consensual prostitution group.")
Sure, the children of many unrelated persons are disabled, but the children of siblings, first cousins, etc. are far more likely to be disabled and perhaps those children, if able to marry, will want to marry someone they are not related to. Then, their chance for having a child without disabilities is almost nil.
I think if incest is occurring, one of the partners is definitely weak and the other is predatory. The weaker one should be protected.
Incest leads to the breakdown of the family unit and the breakdown of the family unit leads to the breakdown of society.
While I don't have any interest what others are doing in their bedrooms, I do care that those "others" aren't closely related because if enough of them are, then what they're doing is eventually going to have an impact on my life as well.