Quote:
My point throughout my posts has been that, if God created good, He created the existence of the other extreme. One who commits to blocking or destroying goodness is evil, not a lesser good. And if free will exists, God gave Man the chance to commit evil. Because He is responsible for all creation, He is responsible for evil. This doesn't discredit God, or refute His existence--it justs demonstrates that perhaps the strictly Biblical version of a Creator is antiquated and slightly inaccurate. I'm still waiting for a reason why this idea itself can't be valid.
It's a valid argument, but it's not Catholic. Theologically: can you give me a purely intrinsically evil feeling? A feeling-- not an act. We all agree that murder is evil. But it's not a feeling, it's an act. The murderer is "feeling" something, what intrinsically evil feeling is he feeling? Pleasure? Pleasure, in and of it's self, isn't something that is usually considered evil. Can give me a feeling that is, in and of itself, "Evil"?
Quote:
From the Thomistic perspective, evil can generally be understood as the absence or lacking of a good, i.e., the absence of some trait that perfects or completes a thing’s being. For example, blindness is a physical evil because it entails the absence of sight and prevents the completion of a person’s physical constitution. To say that blindness is a physical evil, however, does not imply that individuals who are blind are morally bad or lead less valuable lives; only that they lack a physical capability that normally accompanies a complete human life. Moral evil, on the other hand, concerns the disordered nature or defect of a voluntary action (also known as a human act) that in some way fails to correspond to the will of God or proper human fulfillment. For St. Thomas Aquinas, every morally evil act is good in a certain respect, but is a deficient good and so is evil simply (see Summa Theologica I-II Question 18, Article 1, reply to 1). The greater the absence of perfection or completion, the greater the evil. In other words, the more the act fails to correspond to the will of God or proper human fulfillment, the more evil it is. It follows that some evil acts are worse than others.
For an appropriate understanding of the concept of intrinsic evil, one must appreciate first the Catholic understanding of goodness. From the perspective of the Catholic moral tradition, in order for a human act to be morally good, it must be good in all three of its aspects: in its deliberately chosen object, in the agent’s circumstantial intention and in the circumstances of the act. In order for a human act to be considered morally evil it need be defective in only one of these three aspects.
