Printable View
I was wondering what people thought about the contrast between the 2005 film adaptation and Austen's original novel? In particular, the characters? I for one was completely astounded by Macfayden's portrayal of Darcy - who was turned from an arrogant romantic into an awkward introvert.
But I would also like to know anyones thoughts on Donald Sutherland's performance as Mr Bennet, and also Mr Collins.:)
I can't say much good about that adaptation. It was all too peasantish for me. I mean, they are rich, though not as rich as the sea is deep, but there is no need to reduce them to farmers whose chickens walk in the yard.
Anyway, Darcy I found indeed too introverted. Not that he can't be, but his introvertness should be mistakable for pride. And this time that was not. Firth and that more recent one Cowan (?) were also introverted, but they did not come accross as sissies. That's the thing about Darcy. He must come across totally different to what he is, but at the same time be recognisable for what he is to people who know him. Difficult for a script writer and for an actor to accomplish. It is mainly the script writer though who has matters in hand.
Collins I can't remember and as he is the most hilarious figure in the book, his portrayal in the film can't have been much good.
Donald Sutherland I found not sarcastic enough. It seemed that Mr Bennet was happy in his marriage for a change! He was also too much involved in his family of daughters for a man of the era.
I just don't think it was a very good adaptation. It took a lot of liberties with characterisation. Story-wise that is still acceptable if it contributes to a well flowing film (i.e. Sense and Sensibility with Winslet), but characterisation-wise that is an absolute sin.