If anybody wants to discuss about anything in this great novel; I am very interested.
Printable View
If anybody wants to discuss about anything in this great novel; I am very interested.
My opinion, after reading and many rereading of this novel; is that Bazarov isn't a nihilist.
I know he proclaimed himself as a nihilist for several times, but didn't Arkady do the same? And I am sure you don't think that Arkady is a nihilist. The difference is; Arkady realized that his nihilism leads nowhere; how hard is to deny family, love, God etc. Bazarov realized it also, but maybe too late, or he just didn't have enough strength to accept it. His sudden love with Odincova, love for his parents and realization that his actually nobody special are things that made my opinion about this. I find him rather as a cynic, not as a nihilist.
What do you think?
I agree with you there. I think he loved the idea of being a nihilist, in some ways it freed him from many responsibilities and obligations but it also isolated him and left him a very lonely man in the end. As Arkady moved away from that philosophy, I think Bazarov was at first disappointed and disgusted a wee bit but as he saw the things Arkady gained from moving in a different direction and as you said, his love of Odintsova, I think he began to see how desolate his life had really become in some ways.
I am afraid I don't understand.
Idril agrees with me:yawnb: I don't believe it!:D
I don't think that Bazarov was disappointed in Arkady; I think he was aware of his strong influence on Arkady, and he was pretty sure what will happen in situation when his nihilism would have to be shown. Bazarov's only problem was problem of every man; when you fall in love, all your statements are almost ruined...
It happens occasionally. :p :lol:
Maybe disappointed is a bit strong, I don't know what word would be better, sad maybe, regretful at losing his comrade in thought? Maybe like you said he knew it was inevitable, that Arkady's nihilism didn't have very strong roots but that doesn't mean he didn't feel a sort of loss, again, not a great word but the best one that comes to mind at the moment.
Love stinks! :lol: It compromises everything, turns you into something unrecognizable...how's that for bitter? ;) :pQuote:
Originally Posted by bazarov
Well, teacher lost his student, surely he was sad; but he knew it will happen so he was, let's say; prepared for it.
I didn't say that!Quote:
Love stinks! :lol:
Well,something like that...Quote:
It compromises everything, turns you into something unrecognizable...how's that for bitter? ;) :p
Being new here, I'm not sure how active this thread is, and I admit to not reading *most* of it. :blush:
However, I am studying the novel at present -- which involves reading and/ or listening to it several times a week ... :rolleyes: and I found this a very interesting observation...
And with this in mind, it is the greatest irony that he succumbed to the greatest authority we know -- that of death.
Thank you for that thought.
Welcome on forum!
I don't understand.:p
LOL.
The author of the book takes great pains to tell us -- often through Bazarov's own protestations that he is a nihilist, and that he rejects all authority.
When this book was written, it's probable to say that most people would have believed in God as being an authority figure. Hence, the irony that in the end, Bazarov succumbed to death, and God would have been seen as responsible for that.
It was just a thought... not sure if I've explained it properly, and I could be completely wrong ;)
Well when Turgenev was writing Fathers and Sons the definition of a 'nihilist' was still a little obscure, he himself coined the word nihilist in 'Fathers and Sons'.
So that could be a reason why maybe Bazarov only thought he was a nihilist.
We usually are what we think we are. However, as time passes we may, if we're lucky, actually transcend what we have been perhaps for many years. Could this be what happens to Bazarov? We all need to go beyond what we are, to become something more than just an object of our own opinion. I would call this "magnanimity", which is simply greatness of soul. And it goes well with humility, ironically enough.
Their nihilism was a bit different to what I understood by the term, but maybe I did not understand the term properly. I thought nihilism meant you cared about nothing, and that you were amoral. That you believed there was no difference between good and bad, or that sort of thing. Their definition of nihilism was just a rejection of authority in matters of belief. That's just scientific scepticism. I thought they were being a little young and silly.