View Full Version : 200 notes?
kev67
10-29-2016, 05:50 PM
I am slightly confused after reading the first chapter of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. In that chapter, Mr Hyde tramples over a little girl. Someone goes and catches him and he is forced to pay £200 to the girl's family. 200 pounds compensation for a girl who was not hurt that much! If you multiply by 100, which is my rule for comparing Victorian prices to modern day prices, that is £20,000. She was not hurt that much. The incident occurred about 3am in the morning. What was she doing on the streets at that time? I have only finished chapter 1, but if Mr Hyde were that evil, why would he cough up that sort of money?
Jackson Richardson
10-30-2016, 03:55 AM
Is it a euphemism for sex? It is some time that I read the book, but my impression was that although sex was never mentioned, that was the aspect of clean living Dr Jekyll's life that Mr Hyde represents.
And I don't think Victorians were so wrong to think that sexual urges can be dangerous.
Pompey Bum
10-30-2016, 10:39 AM
I've never read Stevenson so I can't address your question directly, but a Victorian reader would probably have understood the money to be a payment to avoid scandal or the appearance of scandal. Perhaps the brutal treatment of a girl followed by throwing of money at the problem was the just kind of blackguardly behavior one would expect from Hyde. But please take that with a grain of salt. I have never read the novel.
kev67
10-30-2016, 11:08 AM
Yes, it was to avoid a scandal, but £200 was very steep. He was forced to pay this by the lawyer who caught him, the doctor who was treating the girl, and the girl's family. Seeing he was a 'gentleman', who could afford to pay, I would have said £20 was more than appropriate. How much could you buy an under age flower girl for? Much less than £1, probably more like a shilling. I dare say the incident happened in a richer part of London, the West End maybe. Therefore the girl and her family were not just some East End proles.
Danik 2016
10-30-2016, 11:31 AM
Victorian literature often suggests much more than it tells. I had the same idea as JR, but thought I was reading the story with eyes of today. In this case I don´t think 200 or even 1000 would be too much no matter what was the social class of the girl or her family.
But curiously there seems to be a difference between copies as to the amount paid:
" ‘If you choose to make capital out of this accident,’ said he, ‘I am naturally helpless. No gentleman but wishes to avoid a scene,’ says he. ‘Name your figure.’ Well, we screwed him up to a hundred pounds for the child’s family; he would have clearly liked to stick out; but there was something about the lot of us that meant mischief, and at last he struck."
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/stevenson/robert_louis/s848dj/chapter1.html
kev67
10-30-2016, 03:14 PM
With regard to sex, I don't think there was any implied between Mr Hyde and the girl. Hyde just clattered into her in the street. I wonder if his C19th readers would have suspected a homosexual relationship between Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The lawyer does not understand why his old friend has altered his will in favour of Mr Hyde, or why Dr Jekyll would instantly write out a cheque for nearly £200 for him. Mr Hyde is described as a young man although small. The lawyer finds him repellant.
Pompey Bum
10-30-2016, 03:22 PM
Yes, it was to avoid a scandal, but £200 was very steep. He was forced to pay this by the lawyer who caught him, the doctor who was treating the girl, and the girl's family. Seeing he was a 'gentleman', who could afford to pay, I would have said £20 was more than appropriate. How much could you buy an under age flower girl for? Much less than £1, probably more like a shilling. I dare say the incident happened in a richer part of London, the West End maybe. Therefore the girl and her family were not just some East End proles.
Well, it never happened at all, of course, so it's just whatever point Stevenson was trying to make. But reputation was a valuable and vulnerable commodity at the time (think Vanity Fair), and maybe that was just the going rate for a wealthy gentleman.
kev67
10-31-2016, 07:49 AM
Dr Jekyll could afford it. Mr Hyde is set to inherit £250,000 in Jekyll's will, which Mr Utterson is not very happy about. This at a time when the vast majority of households had to keep themselves on less than £100 a year.
Danik 2016
10-31-2016, 08:31 AM
No spoilers!
But this information makes me still more inclined to think that the amount exacted from Hyde was 100 and not 200 pounds.
Pompey Bum
10-31-2016, 08:35 AM
Dr Jekyll could afford it. Mr Hyde is set to inherit £250,000 in Jekyll's will, which Mr Utterson is not very happy about. This at a time when the vast majority of households had to keep themselves on less than £100 a year.
Or .5 trampled flower girl per annum. :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.