Francis92
11-03-2015, 07:14 AM
Diagramming high-feelings.
High feelings means when your feelings are aroused. The object of this post is to describe if shapes can abbreviate the human emotions, to create a "learning model" which needs votes. Modeling the human emotion not by art but by shapes is predominantly not as humane as art.
The minds flows in a conscious constant, the intrusion is the experience and the mind works throughout the new leveling and stages.
9683
Reference to bellow.
The height of which describes the integrity of tension, the higher, the more abstract and subconsciously submersed in what the cause, and the individual presents it to be. Meaning a manageable emotional state.
The lower the flow, the higher integrity of the object and it's greater conscious state and therefore the status of intuitiveness per se. We can color these according to ‘Process and Thesis’. Process meaning to think within the idea, and to explain---process has subliminal confrontations with the “thesis” which is, an entitlement towards persecution from outer or internal prescription. The shapes which I could describe the many potentials of mental scenarios, is in fact my own thoughts in the state “process”. The state of mind I call “thesis” is the reluctance to manage the inner thoughts and which has a place within low discrete feelings. And when both present itself, it is usually confusion that the individual adopts therefore we can find behavioral patterns through shapes and diagrams as long as we can refer to such an idea, but reverently, it’s not a good way to describe behavioural patterns and will need more complexities such as additional content and context. That it’s more complicated and make things seem harder. Diagrams such as pictures, paintings, drawings can be regarded as “the purpose of art” alias reflection of one own feelings.
An idea I had when I was younger. The problem, this diagram has is that, it’s entirely precocious in simplification. This form is non-innovative and not relatable.
Conclusion, showing shapes of the human consciousness is unconventional and poorly presents context, it is also unnatural for human perceptibility. Metaphorically, use symbols and diagrams to make it relatable to the general audience. The reflections within abstract art are perceivable by more knowledgeable but showing shapes itself does not make things better.
(Made mistake with poll thing) Just type poll x.
POLL
Poll 1: Art is more reflective while modeling human emotion and it's behaviours of intensity and integrity is superfluous.
Poll 2: The "process and thesis" does not work efficiently or productively even when evolutionized to represent the human emotions. It has problems.
Poll 3: Who cares about this.
Poll 4: This "process and thesis" can be developed, we can describe human emotion more easily through this system.
Poll 5: This is good, for idiots.
High feelings means when your feelings are aroused. The object of this post is to describe if shapes can abbreviate the human emotions, to create a "learning model" which needs votes. Modeling the human emotion not by art but by shapes is predominantly not as humane as art.
The minds flows in a conscious constant, the intrusion is the experience and the mind works throughout the new leveling and stages.
9683
Reference to bellow.
The height of which describes the integrity of tension, the higher, the more abstract and subconsciously submersed in what the cause, and the individual presents it to be. Meaning a manageable emotional state.
The lower the flow, the higher integrity of the object and it's greater conscious state and therefore the status of intuitiveness per se. We can color these according to ‘Process and Thesis’. Process meaning to think within the idea, and to explain---process has subliminal confrontations with the “thesis” which is, an entitlement towards persecution from outer or internal prescription. The shapes which I could describe the many potentials of mental scenarios, is in fact my own thoughts in the state “process”. The state of mind I call “thesis” is the reluctance to manage the inner thoughts and which has a place within low discrete feelings. And when both present itself, it is usually confusion that the individual adopts therefore we can find behavioral patterns through shapes and diagrams as long as we can refer to such an idea, but reverently, it’s not a good way to describe behavioural patterns and will need more complexities such as additional content and context. That it’s more complicated and make things seem harder. Diagrams such as pictures, paintings, drawings can be regarded as “the purpose of art” alias reflection of one own feelings.
An idea I had when I was younger. The problem, this diagram has is that, it’s entirely precocious in simplification. This form is non-innovative and not relatable.
Conclusion, showing shapes of the human consciousness is unconventional and poorly presents context, it is also unnatural for human perceptibility. Metaphorically, use symbols and diagrams to make it relatable to the general audience. The reflections within abstract art are perceivable by more knowledgeable but showing shapes itself does not make things better.
(Made mistake with poll thing) Just type poll x.
POLL
Poll 1: Art is more reflective while modeling human emotion and it's behaviours of intensity and integrity is superfluous.
Poll 2: The "process and thesis" does not work efficiently or productively even when evolutionized to represent the human emotions. It has problems.
Poll 3: Who cares about this.
Poll 4: This "process and thesis" can be developed, we can describe human emotion more easily through this system.
Poll 5: This is good, for idiots.