PDA

View Full Version : Svetlana Alexievich wins 2015 Nobel prize in literature



gustave dore
10-08-2015, 08:30 AM
The Belarusian author Svetlana Alexievich has been awarded the 2015 Nobel prize in literature.

The chair of the Swedish Academy, Sara Danius, said Alexeivich’s work was a “monument to suffering and courage in our time”.
Live Nobel prize in literature: Svetlana Alexievich wins 'for her polyphonic writings' – live
Follow all the news, views and reaction to the Belarusian writer and journalist’s win of the world’s premier literary award
Read more

She becomes the 14th woman to win the prize since it was first awarded in 1901. The last woman to win, Canada’s Alice Munro, was handed the award in 2013.

Alexievich was born on the 31 May 1948 in the Ukrainian town of Ivano-Frankovsk into a family of a serviceman. Her father is Belarusian and her mother is Ukrainian. After her father’s demobilisation from the army the family returned to his native Belorussia and settled in a village where both parents worked as schoolteachers. She left school to work as a reporter on the local paper in the town of Narovl.

She has written short stories, essays and reportage but says she found her voice under the influence of the Belorusian writer Ales Adamovich, who developed a genre which he variously called the “collective novel”, “novel-oratorio”, “novel-evidence”, “people talking about themselves” and the “epic chorus”.

According to Sara Danius, the permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, Alexeivich is an “extraordinary” writer.

“For the past 30 or 40 years she’s been busy mapping the Soviet and post soviet individual,” Danius said, “but it’s not really about a history of events. It’s a history of emotions – what she’s offering us is really an emotional world, so these historical events she’s covering in her various books, for example the Chernobyl disaster, the Soviet war in Afghanistan, these are in a way just pretexts for exploring the Soviet individual and the post-Soviet individual.”

“She’s conducted thousands and thousands of interviews with children, with women and with men, and in this way she’s offering us a history of human beings about whom we didn’t know that much ... and at the same time she’s offering us a history of emotions, a history of the soul.”
Extract: Voices from Chernobyl by Svetlana Alexievich
Read more

Danius also praised Alexievich for devising “a new kind of literary genre”, and pointed new readers towards her first book U vojny ne ženskoe lico (War’s Unwomanly Face), based on interviews with hundreds of women who participated in the second world war.

“It’s an exploration of the second world war from a perspective that was, before that book, almost completely unknown,” she said. “It tells the story of the hundreds and hundreds of women who were at the front in the second world war. Almost one million Soviet women participated in the war, and it’s a largely unknown history. It was a huge success in the Soviet Union union when published, and sold more than 2m copies. It’s a touching document and at the same time brings you very close to every individual, and in a few years they all will be gone.”
Advertisement

Independent publisher Fitzcarraldo Editions is due to release Alexievich’s new book, Second-hand Time, next year. Editor Jacques Testard called it “phenomenal”.


“It’s an oral history, as are all her books, about nostalgia for the Soviet Union,” said Testard. “She went around Russia interviewing people after the fall of the Soviet Union, in an attempt to surmise what the collective post Soviet psyche is. As with all her books, it’s really harrowing – a story about loss of identity, about finding yourself in a country which you don’t recognise any more. It’s a micro-historical survey of Russia in the second half of the 20th century, and it goes up to the Putin years.”

Testard read the book in French a couple of years ago. “She’s been a big deal in Europe for a long time, but she’s never really been picked up in England,” he said.

“Her books are very unusual and difficult to categorise. They’re technically non-fiction, but English and American publishers are loath to take risks on a book just because it’s good, without something like a Nobel prize.”

Alexievich led the odds for the 2015 award, ahead of Japan’s Haruki Murakami, Kenya’s Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and the Norwegian playwright Jon Fosse.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/oct/08/svetlana-alexievich-wins-2015-nobel-prize-in-literature
Once again, the prize goes to another writer no-one has heard of. I suggest the next great unknown writer they award the prize to should be a satirical epic poem writer from bulgaria.

ennison
10-09-2015, 01:30 PM
Who is this no one? A mate of yours?

gustave dore
10-09-2015, 05:14 PM
I was making a joke.

wordeater
10-09-2015, 07:00 PM
She's a non-fiction writer and journalist from Belarus. She wrote about Chernobyl and the downfall of the Soviet regime. She was persecuted by the Lukashenko regime and lived in France and Germany for a while. She returned to Belarus in 2011. Is this another political choice?

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 07:28 PM
You think?

Again the masters McCarthy, DeLillo, Pynchon, and Roth are slighted for being White American male authors. Shameful.

gustave dore
10-09-2015, 07:31 PM
They're not the only great living writers.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 07:52 PM
Wow, that's a scintillating response that says nothing; I never said they were. They are definitely arguably the 4 most accomplished and brilliant novelists alive whose work is held in much higher regard internationally than Alexievich, and are the literary giants you bemoan have been ignored. If you want to make a case against them, though, please do.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 07:57 PM
Double post.

gustave dore
10-09-2015, 08:21 PM
I wasn't making a case against them, I just thought they weren't passed over for being white males. I am against politicizing the prize too, but at the same time I do think they should acknowledge that there are other great writers outside of north america and Europe without trying to dig into third-rank countries for writers barely anyone reads for the sake of political correctness. But above all, I think they should give the award to writers with a established reputation and based on reasons of literary merit.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 08:44 PM
You wrongly corrected me by saying "they're not the only great living writers," when I never said they were, which was a knock on their superior qualifications to most living writers.

Secondly, they are being passed over for being White American males without explicit leftist politics because the committee has shown they won't vote for those authors. In their announcement, they said they were rewarding suffering and courage; White American male authors can't match up in that category. Your admitting they base their judgments on political correctness supports that.

And, what exactly is a "third-rank country"? The country of the author should be irrelevant; they're rewarding the author's work, not where they had the fortune or misfortune to be born.

Anyway, we agree they should give the award to writers with established reputations, and no writers have more established reputations in the literary world than Pynchon, McCarthy, Roth, and Delillo.

ennison
10-09-2015, 09:35 PM
You've made the case against them yourself by presenting them as boringly as you could.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 09:39 PM
There are two problem with that insipid comment. One, you haven't shown in any way how my presentation was "boring." Secondly, the legitimacy of their candidacy is in no way predicated on my presentation.

So, try again. Maybe you can actually address the arguments I made in my last post, this time.

HCabret
10-09-2015, 10:28 PM
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/oct/08/svetlana-alexievich-wins-2015-nobel-prize-in-literature
Once again, the prize goes to another writer no-one has heard of. I suggest the next great unknown writer they award the prize to should be a satirical epic poem writer from bulgaria.
Just because you personally haven't heard of her, doesnt mean that other people haven't.

gustave dore
10-09-2015, 10:33 PM
When I said third-rank country, I was referring to nations with weak literary traditions. Countries like America and France have strong literary traditions and still have many great writers to choose from. I agree with you that the country of an author is irrelevant, and that have been great writers born in obscure countries. But those writers are only among an handful of writers those countries havre worth reading. Countries like China, Japan, Germany, England, America, Russia, France etc. have a wealth of writers to read.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 10:41 PM
Again, who cares? They're not rewarding traditions or countries with them; they're rewarding writers.

ennison
10-09-2015, 10:46 PM
You did not make any arguments. You referred to them as "white American and male". Since when did such boring qualities become those the Swedish Academy should take into account.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 11:18 PM
Of course I did. You were just too anxious to be rude, contentious, and wrong that you failed to notice. Here was my first argument:

"I never said they were. They are definitely arguably the 4 most accomplished and brilliant novelists alive whose work is held in much higher regard internationally than Alexievich, and are the literary giants you bemoan have been ignored. If you want to make a case against them, though, please do."

and here was my followup in the next post:

"You wrongly corrected me by saying "they're not the only great living writers," when I never said they were, which was a knock on their superior qualifications to most living writers.

Secondly, they are being passed over for being White American males without explicit leftist politics because the committee has shown they won't vote for those authors. In their announcement, they said they were rewarding suffering and courage; White American male authors can't match up in that category. Your admitting they base their judgments on political correctness supports that."

So, my argument was clearly that the four authors are arguably the 4 most accomplished and brilliant novelists alive whose work is held in much higher regard internationally than Alexievich, and they were predominantly passed over for being White American Males even though they had superior qualifications to most other writers. I certainly didn't just make their being White American males their reason for being given the award.

So, the only boring--as well as erroneous and antagonistic--posts have been yours. So, as I said before, try again.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 11:19 PM
double post

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 11:20 PM
editing error

ennison
10-09-2015, 11:47 PM
Yeah right. You have a huge chip on your shoulder. I doubt whether the credentials of the writers you refer to are enhanced by your xenophobic assumptions. I have several times on this site expressed my admiration for two of the four.

nick mcglue
10-09-2015, 11:55 PM
Yeah, right, and thanks for showing you can't counter my arguments. Of course, you already showed that. And the only one with a chip on his shoulder is you, and you've made that chip abundantly clear. And I made no "xenophobic assumptions." The fact you can't show what those "assumptions" are just proves it.

So, since you understandably didn't counter my arguments and can't back up yours, we can move on.

Scheherazade
10-10-2015, 06:29 AM
Since this thread has stopped serving its original purpose, it is now closed.

Oh, and on future, do not personalise your arguments.