Robert E Lee
04-17-2003, 03:42 PM
I am aware that you are discussing this in the insanity thread, but I feel that Raskolnikov deserves his own thread.
No, Raskolnikov is not insane. Like all youths he is impetuous and idealistic. The fact that he murdered the pawnbroker does not imply insanity; it implies determination. Ask any young communist attending Berkeley what he thinks about the execution of the tsar and his family. He'll tell you that they deserved it for the misery they caused. I myself can say the same thing about Robespierre's execution of the monarchs in Revolutionary France.
Raskolnikov's eccentricity, a trademark of Dostoevsky characters, is a product of his guilt. This is not insanity either. Dostoevsky portrays his guilt and self-torment as his realization that what he did was wrong; and of course, Dostoevsky was a notable religious zealot.
Neither Raskolnikov's actions or their subsequent effects on his psychology are products of insanity.
No, Raskolnikov is not insane. Like all youths he is impetuous and idealistic. The fact that he murdered the pawnbroker does not imply insanity; it implies determination. Ask any young communist attending Berkeley what he thinks about the execution of the tsar and his family. He'll tell you that they deserved it for the misery they caused. I myself can say the same thing about Robespierre's execution of the monarchs in Revolutionary France.
Raskolnikov's eccentricity, a trademark of Dostoevsky characters, is a product of his guilt. This is not insanity either. Dostoevsky portrays his guilt and self-torment as his realization that what he did was wrong; and of course, Dostoevsky was a notable religious zealot.
Neither Raskolnikov's actions or their subsequent effects on his psychology are products of insanity.