Judge Judy Style

[cacian]

should close family members take each other to court over money or minor incidents and also go public about it?
I first watched Judy for the first time for law programming purposes but then it became clear it was more about families taking each apart on tv.
In this program I learned quickly that families took each other to court and fought each other publically and on tv.
I have to admit that the concept terrified me because for a parent to take their own daughters and sons to court over money issues/rent/minor incidents is not something I grew up with. It seemed rather unjust and uncalled for.
That was for me is the height of shock I have never experienced anything like it in my life.
I consider families ties different from this. Families are for each other and definitely not about blaming each other in front of the law. How is a child to learn anthing if the mother takes him her to court?

[hannah_arendt]

First of all, parents should think about the children. That`s the most important thing. The court is something very stressful to for the child.

[cacian]

First of all, parents should think about the children. That`s the most important thing. The court is something very stressful to for the child.

Here the child is any age between sixteen to 30. I have seen a whole family gang up one brother or sister from that same family and in court.

[hannah_arendt]

There many programs about it in polish tv too, but I don`t watch it.

[Lokasenna]

My understanding is that it is not recognised as a legal court - that the idiots who take part are under contractual, rather than legal, obligation to obey the old bat?

Such things shouldn't be aired in public - I'm extremely glad that here in the UK they keep the TV cameras out of the court rooms. It would be an invasion of privacy for all concerned. And as for making an entertainment programme about it... well, it's little short of a human form of bear-baiting.

[cacian]

My understanding is that it is not recognised as a legal court - that the idiots who take part are under contractual, rather than legal, obligation to obey the old bat?

haha the old bat sounds like a right name LOL


Such things shouldn't be aired in public - I'm extremely glad that here in the UK they keep the TV cameras out of the court rooms. It would be an invasion of privacy for all concerned. And as for making an entertainment programme about it... well, it's little short of a human form of bear-baiting.
I completely that court rooms should be kept away from cameras in Media. I was surprised that in South Africa court rooms are aired like in America. Regarding the courts here in the UK sketches of witnesses victims and culprits are allowed. We often see them on the news. The news reports seem to also quote report what has been said in the court rooms. I am surprised that is allowed.

[Adolescent09]

Man... that old duck is still quacking? I thought her lungs would have retired by now.

[cacian]

Man... that old duck is still quacking? I thought her lungs would have collapsed by now.

LOL it seems not from where I am standing she still kwacking at everyone or so it seems. The one I really feel sorry about is the guy the guard the stands all day long is his feet handing in papers back and forth. He looks like he could really do with a sit down. I cannot bear watching judgy any more because of him.:nonod:

[Delta40]

My understanding is that it is not recognised as a legal court - that the idiots who take part are under contractual, rather than legal, obligation to obey the old bat?

Such things shouldn't be aired in public - I'm extremely glad that here in the UK they keep the TV cameras out of the court rooms. It would be an invasion of privacy for all concerned. And as for making an entertainment programme about it... well, it's little short of a human form of bear-baiting.

I agree thank god. Now hush, Jeremy Kyle is about to air a far superior kind of laundry - doesn't even leave stains...