IntravenousJava
06-01-2012, 09:10 AM
Do you, as a reader, prefer to read fashionably dressed works of dubious depth or profundity in rags?
I have always been eminently impressionable with respect to literary style and eloquence, but I'm also a self-styled philosopher in search of wisdom. Sadly, it's been my experience that many of the greatest thinkers are all but unreadable while some of the greatest literary stylists make a very scintillating display of drivel. For me at least this is problematic.
How does one penetrate to the depths of a work whose syntax and diction are virtually impenetrable?
Perhaps the simplest answer is alternation: plod grimly through the denser forests for a spell and then turn to the shallow, bubbling brooks for relief and refreshment. That's the best I can contrive.
Any thoughts?
I have always been eminently impressionable with respect to literary style and eloquence, but I'm also a self-styled philosopher in search of wisdom. Sadly, it's been my experience that many of the greatest thinkers are all but unreadable while some of the greatest literary stylists make a very scintillating display of drivel. For me at least this is problematic.
How does one penetrate to the depths of a work whose syntax and diction are virtually impenetrable?
Perhaps the simplest answer is alternation: plod grimly through the denser forests for a spell and then turn to the shallow, bubbling brooks for relief and refreshment. That's the best I can contrive.
Any thoughts?