No Subject

[Karen Oriole]

You're comment makes you sound like a intellectual eliteist, maybe try to be less condesending next time and people will listen to you. <br>Feeble,Discredit,Scant,Thereafter What's you're basic problem you think everbody but you is stupid? Talk like a normal person don't be such a snob!!!!

[Ruth Richert]

For everyone: If you'd like the essential arguments without having to read the entire work, try Chapter 15.<br><br>For religious people making feeble attempts to discredit the theory of evolution: Congratulations on your "theory" victory! Yes, evolution is only a theory, and at the time of its introduction, Darwin had--relative to now--scant evidence to support it. But before rejoicing just yet, please bother to take into account the 144-years'-worth of spectacularly compelling evidence observed and recorded by hundreds of thousands of people since the theory's introduction. The merit of a theory, after all, is based not only on the evidence present at the time of its publication but on every piece of evidence found thereafter. If your religion is so unfortunate as to need the theory of evolution to be false, it's a wonder it survived the theory that the earth revolves around the sun. Or did it?

[Jilvin]

I am inferring that because somebody pruposes an argument with confidence that contains superior intellectual merit to yours; that your only option is to call them an "elitist snob" (i.e. someobody who knows more than you on the subject.)