Jassy Melson
02-25-2011, 07:47 AM
In this article I intend to explain and show how acceptance of open homosexuality in the U.S. military will weaken the effectiveness of it as a fighting force.
The Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy concerning homosexuals in the military was and still is the best policy. Instituted by President Clinton and put into force by the U.S. Congress in the 1990s, the policy was the wisest and sanest move that could have been made. Unfortunately, beginning in the latter 1990s, an agenda was pushed forward by certain radicals, an agenda that kept gaining strength. It wanted and demanded nothing less than a total repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the complete open acceptance of homosexuality in the U.S. military, including in a combat situation. If this agenda is accepted and put into play, the result will be disorganization at the best and chaos at the worst in the military. It will result in the weakening of the U.S. military and make it an ineffective fighting force, and cause the deaths of U.S. soldiers
It may come as a surprise to some that the job of the U.S. military up to the latter 1990s was viewed as not complex, but relatively simple. Its job was to defend the territory of the U.S., protect U.S. interests abroad, and to sometimes fight the spread of communism. In the past fifteen years however, the tasks of the military has been demanded by some radicals to become broadened and to enter into fields in which the military had never been involved. These radicals have demanded that the U.S. military become involved in social issues, social engineering, and issues of a public nature. In short, the military is being called upon to perform tasks it is not suited for, and to promote certain social issues that it is ill-equipped to provide. The U.S. military was never meant to be a provider of rights, pleasures, liberty, or free expression, or a headquarters for the promotion of a certain social agenda. The military's job is to fight—and nothing else.
What is occurring in the U.S. military is a social experiment. Certain radicals have chosen to use the military as a means to promote their agenda. They want unrestrained release of sexual and personal inhibitions, in public and on the battlefield.. In short, when it comes to sex, they don't want any rules whatsoever in the U.S military. What the radicals don't understand (or maybe they do) is that the military operates by rules. Take away certain rules and the U.S. military will become weakened. Take away all rules and the military will collapse.
Never before in the history of the U.S military has it been put under such pressure to promote a certain social agenda. The news is that the military simply cannot do it. It doesn't have the know-how or the tools to suddenly change policies it has followed for more than two hundred years. Put simply, too much is being asked of the U.S. military.
One of the questions that needs to be addressed and hasn't been is why? Why has the military been chosen by certain radicals as a means to advance their agenda? Perhaps they understand that in America the U.S. military is, in some cases, the last bastion of strength, restraint and order. Perhaps they think that by attacking the military from within and from behind, so to speak, they will catch it by surprise and be able to “crush the foul thing,” to quote Voltaire in another context. It is difficult to know the radicals' true motivations for attempting to so abruptly change the policies of the U. S. military. Perhaps the answer is quite simple. The reasons that are guiding and directing the radicals could be that they think that by attacking and defeating the United States' strongest point, the defeat of the other weaker points will be a relatively simple matter.
It wasn't until the 2000s that the radicals, and in some cases militants, gained the support of a number of Congresspeople and judges. They began demanding that Don't Ask, Don't Tell be abolished, and that acceptance of open homosexuality by the U.S. military be put into effect. This is part of the radicals homosexual agenda for America. This agenda for the U.S. can be found by Googling “Homosexuals' Agenda for the U.S.” on any computer.
The radicals know that if open homosexuality is accepted as policy in the U.S. military that the first and most important allegiance and attachment of homosexuals will be to their homosexual partners, not to the military or to their country. Homosexuals will congregate, and demand to be able to bed with their partners. The U.S. military will have no choice but to allow this to happen, because it will be the policy of it to accept open homosexuality. The radicals will demand that homosexual marriage be recognized and openly accepted by the military. Again, the U.S. military will have no choice. It will be forced to accept it. If the military openly accepts homosexuals, it will open a Pandora's box.
Some may say that if the U.S. military openly accepts and acknowledges homosexuals in its ranks, that the military will not be changed, it will remain the same. I assert that the military will not only change; if homosexuality is openly accepted as policy, it will result in complete disorganization, indeed, even chaos, and will result in the weakening of the U.S. military and make it an ineffective fighting force. It will do this because the first and most important attachment and allegiance of homosexuals will be to fellow homosexuals and to their partners. It will not be to their “outfit,” or to the military in general. Some will say no, this will not occur, that homosexuals' foremost allegiance and attachment will be to their country's defense and to the U.S. military. I think those who assert that the military will not change if homosexuality is openly accepted within it are naive at the best and liars at the worst.
To be continued.
The Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy concerning homosexuals in the military was and still is the best policy. Instituted by President Clinton and put into force by the U.S. Congress in the 1990s, the policy was the wisest and sanest move that could have been made. Unfortunately, beginning in the latter 1990s, an agenda was pushed forward by certain radicals, an agenda that kept gaining strength. It wanted and demanded nothing less than a total repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and the complete open acceptance of homosexuality in the U.S. military, including in a combat situation. If this agenda is accepted and put into play, the result will be disorganization at the best and chaos at the worst in the military. It will result in the weakening of the U.S. military and make it an ineffective fighting force, and cause the deaths of U.S. soldiers
It may come as a surprise to some that the job of the U.S. military up to the latter 1990s was viewed as not complex, but relatively simple. Its job was to defend the territory of the U.S., protect U.S. interests abroad, and to sometimes fight the spread of communism. In the past fifteen years however, the tasks of the military has been demanded by some radicals to become broadened and to enter into fields in which the military had never been involved. These radicals have demanded that the U.S. military become involved in social issues, social engineering, and issues of a public nature. In short, the military is being called upon to perform tasks it is not suited for, and to promote certain social issues that it is ill-equipped to provide. The U.S. military was never meant to be a provider of rights, pleasures, liberty, or free expression, or a headquarters for the promotion of a certain social agenda. The military's job is to fight—and nothing else.
What is occurring in the U.S. military is a social experiment. Certain radicals have chosen to use the military as a means to promote their agenda. They want unrestrained release of sexual and personal inhibitions, in public and on the battlefield.. In short, when it comes to sex, they don't want any rules whatsoever in the U.S military. What the radicals don't understand (or maybe they do) is that the military operates by rules. Take away certain rules and the U.S. military will become weakened. Take away all rules and the military will collapse.
Never before in the history of the U.S military has it been put under such pressure to promote a certain social agenda. The news is that the military simply cannot do it. It doesn't have the know-how or the tools to suddenly change policies it has followed for more than two hundred years. Put simply, too much is being asked of the U.S. military.
One of the questions that needs to be addressed and hasn't been is why? Why has the military been chosen by certain radicals as a means to advance their agenda? Perhaps they understand that in America the U.S. military is, in some cases, the last bastion of strength, restraint and order. Perhaps they think that by attacking the military from within and from behind, so to speak, they will catch it by surprise and be able to “crush the foul thing,” to quote Voltaire in another context. It is difficult to know the radicals' true motivations for attempting to so abruptly change the policies of the U. S. military. Perhaps the answer is quite simple. The reasons that are guiding and directing the radicals could be that they think that by attacking and defeating the United States' strongest point, the defeat of the other weaker points will be a relatively simple matter.
It wasn't until the 2000s that the radicals, and in some cases militants, gained the support of a number of Congresspeople and judges. They began demanding that Don't Ask, Don't Tell be abolished, and that acceptance of open homosexuality by the U.S. military be put into effect. This is part of the radicals homosexual agenda for America. This agenda for the U.S. can be found by Googling “Homosexuals' Agenda for the U.S.” on any computer.
The radicals know that if open homosexuality is accepted as policy in the U.S. military that the first and most important allegiance and attachment of homosexuals will be to their homosexual partners, not to the military or to their country. Homosexuals will congregate, and demand to be able to bed with their partners. The U.S. military will have no choice but to allow this to happen, because it will be the policy of it to accept open homosexuality. The radicals will demand that homosexual marriage be recognized and openly accepted by the military. Again, the U.S. military will have no choice. It will be forced to accept it. If the military openly accepts homosexuals, it will open a Pandora's box.
Some may say that if the U.S. military openly accepts and acknowledges homosexuals in its ranks, that the military will not be changed, it will remain the same. I assert that the military will not only change; if homosexuality is openly accepted as policy, it will result in complete disorganization, indeed, even chaos, and will result in the weakening of the U.S. military and make it an ineffective fighting force. It will do this because the first and most important attachment and allegiance of homosexuals will be to fellow homosexuals and to their partners. It will not be to their “outfit,” or to the military in general. Some will say no, this will not occur, that homosexuals' foremost allegiance and attachment will be to their country's defense and to the U.S. military. I think those who assert that the military will not change if homosexuality is openly accepted within it are naive at the best and liars at the worst.
To be continued.