K K Srivastava
06-20-2010, 03:25 AM
Rains descended from the heaven,
and drenched her to her core.
Having thought, for a while,
over the matters ponderous,
I felt what dryness was all about.
Exclusiveness in it’s ubiquity fell
from everywhere,
and absorbed her florid quietness, mutely.
Having thought, for a while,
over the dulled trivialities,
I felt what depth of innocence was all about.
Bright and shining images recoiled
innocently,
and wrecked the ruins around her.
In the infinitude of my own mortifications,
I could feel voiceless voices voicing something.
I wouldn’t quiz her about her choicest
ecstasies,
and also about her substance.
Nor would I quiz her about the remnants of
her musical humility
and it’s morbid stillness.
Allusions do have their limitations,
these fly, endlessly,
demurred and obstinated.
Lightly engrossed in elevated incongruities,
I severed their (allusions) internal relationships.
I looked through these allusions,
my intellectual restraints loathed my narrowness.
And her eyes gave a pensive look to the triumphal
sensuality of my stilted mind.
The glass has just broken.
Scattered and scattered.
I heard no echo.
She peeped into broken glasses,
castigating me for not seeing
the allusions,
tamed me there, for a while,
and I saw no reason why should I leave
the allusions.
Can an echo represent an allusion?
Can separation represent togetherness?
Can what is not lost represent the gain?
Can turbulence represent concealed peace?
and drenched her to her core.
Having thought, for a while,
over the matters ponderous,
I felt what dryness was all about.
Exclusiveness in it’s ubiquity fell
from everywhere,
and absorbed her florid quietness, mutely.
Having thought, for a while,
over the dulled trivialities,
I felt what depth of innocence was all about.
Bright and shining images recoiled
innocently,
and wrecked the ruins around her.
In the infinitude of my own mortifications,
I could feel voiceless voices voicing something.
I wouldn’t quiz her about her choicest
ecstasies,
and also about her substance.
Nor would I quiz her about the remnants of
her musical humility
and it’s morbid stillness.
Allusions do have their limitations,
these fly, endlessly,
demurred and obstinated.
Lightly engrossed in elevated incongruities,
I severed their (allusions) internal relationships.
I looked through these allusions,
my intellectual restraints loathed my narrowness.
And her eyes gave a pensive look to the triumphal
sensuality of my stilted mind.
The glass has just broken.
Scattered and scattered.
I heard no echo.
She peeped into broken glasses,
castigating me for not seeing
the allusions,
tamed me there, for a while,
and I saw no reason why should I leave
the allusions.
Can an echo represent an allusion?
Can separation represent togetherness?
Can what is not lost represent the gain?
Can turbulence represent concealed peace?