View Full Version : Protocols of Zion
MrRegular
06-17-2010, 01:12 PM
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Let's see how many synonyms for 'hoax' you milksops can come up with(though probably not a one of you has ever laid a finger on this book) before Admin deletes this thread (without a word of explanation).
Shall we plug our ears and 'nah' together in prayer?
ennison
06-17-2010, 01:29 PM
"milksops" !! I say, how quaintly 19th century. I'm sure every word of it is true even if it is a hoax! Truly a hoax.
MrRegular
06-17-2010, 01:43 PM
thank you sir.:iagree:
Well, I already assumed control of the underworkings of Lit-Net, it is only time before I take the internet as a whole.
Seriously - what is the point of this thread? aught to be in games.
PeterL
06-17-2010, 04:45 PM
There is atheory that the Protocols was intended as a satire. If that is true, then it might be worth discussing, but it is only a theory.
There is atheory that the Protocols was intended as a satire. If that is true, then it might be worth discussing, but it is only a theory.
From what I understand, it first appeared in a newspaper to little attention, until it was printed in some mediocre novel, and then slowly made its way to become a favorite of Ford, who brought it to America (with plenty other stuff, he got on quite well with Hitler, same ideas). I don't know if they were ever taken seriously though, in these that I don't think anybody with half a brain believed them, even Hitler, who though anti-Semitic to the core, probably didn't believe the facts, only the general idea.
Though, the original publication it ran in was Czarist, and they had a penchant for promoting Antisemitism to divert attention from their own incompetence.
MrRegular
06-18-2010, 01:21 AM
You see these are the very same sentiments which I expected. "Not worth looking at," "A joke," THIS IS EVEN WHAT WIKIPEDIA SAYS. But when one actually handles the book, the weight of the words (especially in modern hands) is undenieable.
So how many other ways can you dance about the ACTUAL causes stated in this book for which we currently live in an evironment constantly displaying effects?
Also, JBI, you say that you are currently undermining this website, does that mean that you are Jewish?
Drkshadow03
06-18-2010, 06:21 AM
You see these are the very same sentiments which I expected. "Not worth looking at," "A joke," THIS IS EVEN WHAT WIKIPEDIA SAYS. But when one actually handles the book, the weight of the words (especially in modern hands) is undenieable.
So how many other ways can you dance about the ACTUAL causes stated in this book for which we currently live in an evironment constantly displaying effects?
Also, JBI, you say that you are currently undermining this website, does that mean that you are Jewish?
Ah, so you're justing demonstrating run-of-the-mill anti-Semitism then. Good to know.
MarkBastable
06-18-2010, 06:58 AM
You see these are the very same sentiments which I expected. "Not worth looking at," "A joke,"
Perhaps you expect them because they are common reactions. And perhaps they are common reactions because they are sensible reactions.
Incidentally, while you're here, I've always wondered why people with your mindset have such an eccentric grip on spelling, syntax and grammar. The correlation is remarkable. Is it some kind of wilful defiance that's intended to demonstrate your capacity for independent thought?
MrRegular
06-18-2010, 07:45 AM
HA!
And now i've been accused of antisemitism too! Already! Perhaps it will loosen your rectum a bit, my reactionary (programmably so) friend to know that if the accusations made on the Jewish Elders in this work are true (which I believe to be the case), then I would find great excitement in that fact, as i am a proponent of order on the behalf of nature and this is the grand cause of the protocols. The success of the jewish plan would be a wonderful thing. So don't beat me with your common sticks, my mindless defender.
IF THE ZIONIST PROPOSE TO ESTABLISH CONTROL THEN YOU CAN CONSIDER ME PRO-SEMITE, if not then they are just another loopy, wish-washy branch of religion.
Also, If they are common sentiments it is because Parrots are so much more common than rational readers.
STILL WE HAVE NOT ENCOUNTERED A SINGLE PERSON WHO HAS STUDIED THE WORK, yet many detractors. Hmmm. We will read Moby Dick like gospel. but not a work which makes since as truth, proposes to be true and involves a REAL group of very isolated people who have existed throughout recorded history.
FOOLS, here more than anywhere. Goes to show that a fool with a large vocabulary is just as foolish as any, just more talkative.
Scheherazade
06-18-2010, 07:59 AM
before Admin deletes this thread (without a word of explanation).
Here is another expected reaction for you
(but with an explanation!):
This thread now will be closed since it aims to achieve a little more than aggravate.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.