PDA

View Full Version : Individuality: Creation versus Adaptation



coberst
06-10-2010, 07:27 AM
Individuality: Creation versus Adaptation

Creation/Adaptation—Meaning/Biology—creation is to adaptation as meaning is to biology.

Our species is a great experiment by Mother Nature—can a species of animals with self-consciousness survive quick extinction?

We might usefully consider our species as like the first water creatures to colonize the land. This water/land creature is presently an unknown species to science. That is to say that the human species might well represent the same kind of giant evolutionary step because we humans are the first animal to have creative as well as adaptive qualities.

Otto Rank’s will psychology throws meaningful light on the psychological foundation of epistemology and ethics—leading to a philosophy of the psychic—the creation of individuality in “rebirth experience” as being the actual creative act—in this act the psychic ego is born out of the biological corporal ego thus moving from creature to creator—i.e. creator of his own personality.

There is movement from competition with nature to artistic creation of reality which we call civilization—his competition becomes with himself—the inner world becomes an independent power which seeks to alter the external world to more correspond to the inner—this is more creation than adaptation and can be comprehended as will phenomena.

“In this sense civilized man, even if he fights the outside world, is no longer opposed to a natural enemy but at bottom to himself, to his own creation, as he finds himself mirrored, particularly in manners and customs, morality and conventions, social and cultural institutions.”

This idea is based upon the assumption that our inner world, in our creation of it, slowly becomes a power independent of the outer world, which we constantly try to modify to suit our inner reality. This is not adaption but is creation, which can be called ‘will phenomena’.

This is movement from Freudian id which is subject to natural laws under guise of “repetition compulsion” while personality “consists of identifications which form the basis of the parental super-ego”—to move beyond the super-ego morality to an ideal formation to a personality that guides—he evolves the ego ideal from self-chosen factors consciously strived for.

Quickie from Wiki: “Repetition compulsion is psychological phenomenon in which a person repeats a traumatic event or its circumstances over and over again. This includes reenacting the event or putting oneself in situations that have a high probability of the event occurring again. This "re-living" can also take the form of dreams, repeating the story of what happened, and even hallucination.”

This concept, “repetition compulsion”, was noted formally by Sigmund Freud in his 1920 essay Beyond the Pleasure Principle in which he observed a child throw his favorite toy from his crib, become upset at the loss, then reel the toy back, only to repeat this action again.

Quotes from Truth and Reality by Otto Rank

BasDirks
06-10-2010, 09:10 AM
We might usefully consider our species as like the first water creatures to colonize the land. This water/land creature is presently an unknown species to science. That is to say that the human species might well represent the same kind of giant evolutionary step because we humans are the first animal to have creative as well as adaptive qualities.


Do you think life moved from water to land overnight? "Might usefully consider..."? You don't use the comparison at all, it just sits there. "This water/land creature"? What is at stake is a process. Are humans the first animal to have creative as well as adaptive qualities? No, and more importantly, isn't adaption a creative process? The rest I won't go into, but suffice it to say you're all over the place.

Leland Gaunt
06-11-2010, 03:05 PM
Is anyone else sick to death of psychoanalytic theory?

Astromaxis
07-04-2010, 08:39 AM
Interesting thoughts. They do allow the brain to think in different angles thus I Thank You for the Post.

In my opinion Adaptation is, as BasDirks stated, a creative process as well. The concept of the natural enemy also seems hazy because after reading your responses and others' responses and thinking of this thought I have realized that natural enemies can be manifested in many different forms thus to limit it to predatory status is not always a good dimension.

Civilization, may not be fully at present but initially, was the modifications of the same natural drives present in us from our ancestors - civilization does not erase completely the need to mate, reproduce, understand and cogitate on various options available to us. In times of less complex groupings people also resolved to do the same thing.

Thus Creation and Adaptation are linked even to biology and sociology and other aspects of life. We cannot say that we have stopped acting on our sexual drives or eating like hungry starved animals - the biological does accommodate the philosophical many times.

I do agree that learning does lessen many attributes that seem to be only originated by the animal instinct but basically even if you believe in evolution or Allah (God) we all know that there will be variances in a species' life span and they could be very well creative forms of adaptation or adaptive forms of creativity.

Any species need both but the frequencies and methodologies may not always be the same.