Conspiracy! Conspiracy!

[Taliesin]

Here's the game. All of us together start revealing The Giant Conspiracy that has been plotted all through human history by some strange powers. We try to reveal elements from history, science and culture that have been hidden from us. Of course, some of the conspiracists, in their naivety, might be misguided and err but then, others should kindly point out what really happened and what the real reasons are.
Themes near absurdity are encouraged, but let's try to at least pretend that our theories are coherent, supported by logic and the only reason why a multitude of errors appear there is that the Evil Powers That Be have suppressed the theories.
Double identities, secret societies, dabbling with the supernaturals, alien overlords, ancient bloodlines - sky's the limit.

Georg Cantor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor) was obviously a rebel member of secret society of mathematicians whose purpose was to keep technological progress (for which certain mathematical tools were crucial) in check to control society. The secret society, of course, held some other important and secret knowledge too, due to its old age, manipulating the society not only through withholding the mathematics, but with numerous other ways. In fact, the sect probably originates from Pythagoreans, who are even today known for casting to the sea the man who tried to reveal the existence of irrational numbers. The story of the society is a long one and needs more research, so I will maybe speak of it later.
First, in Cantors famous set theory, in it's original, the letters for different types of infinities were not the harmless alephs and omegas, but other Hebrew letters, which betrayed an ancient Kabbalistic spell. In the original manuscript of "Über eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlen", the letters were correct, revealing something terrifying about the true nature of infinities. However, the head of the local departure of the sect, Dedekind, advised his friend to at least change the letters. Cantor, however, only changed some of the letters, which caused a scandal in the field of mathematics, as the head of the society at that time, Kroenecker tried to suppress the knowledge, even in abridged form.
Secondly, one should remark, it is interesting to note that in his later period, Cantor tried to prove to the public that Bacon had in fact written Shakespeares works (which is of course true) to reveal what the Pythagoreans had hidden, trying once more to blow the cover of the organisation. However, he was too slow, since with clever planning, Cantor was declared to be mentally unfit and shoved away.


Do you see other pieces of the jigsaw?

[Babbalanja]

No, you've got it all wrong. All of Cantor's work was actually written by Kroenecker, whose work in turn was all written by Weierstrass. This is revealed in a footnote in Dauben's biography, Cantor? I Just Met 'Er?, a shameless work of propaganda on behalf of the Jewish Kabbalist Jesuit Freemason Templars who control mathematics to this very day. The footnote concerns a visit by Cantor to a beer hall in Berlin. Kroenecker's cousin was said to operate a bar in the very same city. Coincidence? That's what the minions of the transfinitist conspiracy would have you believe.

I don't think you put sufficient emphasis on the reason for this vast historical sleight-of-hand: the J.K.J.F.T.'s wanted to control society by attributing these important works to Cantor, a person with an easy-to-pronounce name, thus dumbing down mathematical history and denying the superiority of mathematicians like Poincaré who you need the ALT key to even refer to online.

Regards,

Istvan

[Taliesin]

Come on. Poincaré? That sub-par clone of Newton? He is seriously over-hyped, third-rate mathematician, only advertised by the Pythagoreans since he is, in fact a clone of Newton who, seeing Einsteins theory of relativity threatening the stable worldview of newtonism, needed someone alike Newton to secretly undermine the theory and guide the public opinion towards supporting Newton. As we all know, there is a strong evidence that Newton, while asexual, felt a strong need for someone to continue his work in the fields of astrology and alchemy - thus, using formulas stolen from the Jewish Jesuit Kabbalists (I am in fact surprised that you consider the JJK and FT to be the same organisation, although there are obvious signs everywhere that the rivalry between them is almost as strong as the one between them and Pythagoreans.), he created a number of clones of himself, who unfortunately possessed only a fraction of his intellect - however, they do possess Newtons natural scientist-aura. Since the genetic combination isn't left invariant by the cloning process, the Pythagoreans have kept trying to achieve the genetic code of Newton again. (I suspect that Alan Turings genetic code might have been quite close to Newtons, but since he cooperated with the British government (who might just be an independent player? The royal lines tend to be), he was assassinated later by either FT, JJK or Pythagoreans - I don't know which one.) Newton quite clearly was a Pythagorean, maybe even possessing the bloodline of Euclid himself.

As for why newtonism was toppled, the only valid reason seems to be the FT- it is in their every interest to cause instability in the world by posturing that "everything is relative" - thus being able to gain popularity among those who seek safety.
And I wouldn't discard Cantor so easily, if I were you. Sure, he plagiarized Kroeneckers work and Kroenecker seemed to think that he was harmless- but there is strong historical evidence in the diaries of Hilbert that he was also a Masonic spy, trying to destabilize the Pythagorean society from inside.

[Babbalanja]

I can't believe you've fallen for the Newtonian propaganda. His biographers can't even agree on the date he was born, Taliesin. Obviously this is evidence that Newton never existed at all, but was a composite persona invented by the Royal Society to take credit for the work of Liebniz and others. Does anyone today remember the name of Nicolas Fatio de Duillier? No, that's because he was the genius whom the Royal Society paid to ghost-write the Principia, and inflate the reputation of the fairy-tale Newton, who you'll recall didn't even exist. Oh, and it helped dumb down physics because the scientific history industry likes the name Newton and that silly apple story.

Don't mock me for failing to discern between the Jewish Jesuit Kabbalists and the Freemason Templars. I can never remember when they amalgamated into United Secret Society and Occult Brewery Ltd.

Regards,

Istvan

[Taliesin]

Hah. You're being ridiculous. I have read the works regarding the faux-Newton theory and you know what? All the sources they have from the times are apparently written in English - but as is known to every linguist, English language didn't exist then. If you study the structure of English more thoroughly it becomes clear that English is a constructed language - generally believed to be created by Goethe who tried to create an universal language, much like Zamenhof later did - happy birthday do Zamenhof, by the way - but unlike Zamenhof, Goethe was successful - in what language are we two communicating here at this moment?
In reality, the language spoken in Albion during these times was a sort of Yiddish with strong Scottish influences - the English being in essence the successors of the Jewish highland clans, driven out from there due to the excessive use of Kabbalistic formulas in their tartan. All works now generally believed by the ignorant common man to be written in English before the 19th century are actually translations from that Scottish-Yiddish language, now almost exctinct.
One should note that therefore, all texts written in "English" originating from that time are obviously just what the JJK and FT expect us to believe. Therefore the faux-Newton theories are wrong, created by the devious Pythagoreans to lead our attention away from their genealogical projects.