Is man better with his GOD and HEAVEN than animals without?

[blazeofglory]

I asked myself this question all the time. How can I be spiritually more elevated, morally more upgraded and spiritually more guided than my fellow-beings-animals? I watch flocks of pigeons and sparrows descending to my verandah everyday and I scatter handfuls of corns to them. They pick up the grains and fly off instantly. I, as a thinker corner myself and think whether these innocent animals are better off than me at all even I am a man of morality, religions, ideas of heaven and hell.
They are not sumptuous, consumerists, and possessive. They do not want to save for tomorrows. They do not hoard greedily for the days to come by making others starved of hunger as we humans do.

Man has invented God, religions and discriminated what is good and bad. What is good and bad is simply a conception, something man has spun out of imagination. Man has invented God, heaven and religions to secure his placed against uncertainties, chaos and disorderliness in nature. He sought art in nature whereas nature in itself is artless and chaotic.

Man is more destructive, his sense of spirituality religiousness and morality.

Man is the cruelest, most heinous creature on this planet. He colonized this planet to destroy it.

Man' s creation or evolution through stages of animals to the sate of rational beings is a grave mistake nature has made.

Now with man's greediness this earth is ecologically getting damaged and desertification of is a certainty.

If you love the planet you must hate homo sapient. Our scientific inventions, discoveries, moral glories, technological advancements, economic theories are all rubbishes.

Nature is completely getting damaged day by day. In a century this planet is going to be so hot that hardly living beings can survive. Imagine what will happen in a millennium if we are constantly engaged in producing intoxicant, pollutants at this alarming rate.The continuous pourings of Acid rains will ruin our rain forests, food crops. Hardly can natural habitats of animals, aquatics, aerials can survive this environmental menace or ecological depredation.

Man's unrestrained desire or consumerism is a self-destructing thing.

The one and only menace or antidote is rational use of all free gifts of nature, its resources.

But man has never been sensitive to this issue despite there are so many activists raising their voices against man's avariciousness.

[Maximilianus]

I kinda like this question. Animals are by far better because of the simple reason that they have no religion nor philosophizing dilemmas. They don't ponder about these existentialist matters that conform humanity's concerns. They don't wonder why they came, why they die, why they can't remain here forever, why some things are right while others wrong, etc. etc. All they care about is life: getting water, food, reproduction, build a dwelling, raise their offspring, watch them grow, protect their families to the best possible, and so on. Animals mind their own business without sticking their noses into irrelevant matters, like "superior beings" often do. They are better because they just do what everyone else should: LIVE ONE DAY AT A TIME AND GET THE BEST OF IT.

[Red-Headed]

Animals such as birds may not have any form of morality, which is a peculiarly human ontological construction, & it would be wrong to compare their activity & behaviour against any form of moral judgement system anyway. Animals try to survive as best they can. If this means consuming their own offspring in times of food shortages or fighting & dying for territorial rights then they will do this by instinct. We have similar instincts as well. In human society we have tried to develop codes to ameliorate problems that are created by our sublimated instincts.