Do women take males as innately and evolutionarily their role models?

[blazeofglory]

Feminine is a natural character and essentially self-governing. They were created or to speak evolutionarily, they evolved in parallel with their counterparts, guys. But to my amazement all they do now is try to mold themselves into maleness. Male chauvinism is not a repellent to them and of course they unreservedly and sneakily supportive of this bigotry. History substantiates this. Women are complete, evolutionarily a wonderful creation and in some ways more fabulously built. But they feel deplete with some stuffs that define males and to be their equals they try to replete themselves with some stuffs that are spectacularly unique of males.

Males and females are inter-reliant, and singly they are incomplete, un-whole. Together they become creators and perpetuators.

Man and woman are two incomplete halves and in togetherness they become a single whole.
Their perpetual brawl is ridiculous. There should not be any rivalry. None of them must hold supremacy on the other.

But females still hold males as supreme. Why?

[billl]

Blaze, there are some injustices in some cases. For example, in some societies, a woman who is raped is punished, while the man is not. Even in societies where things have improved via legislation, there can still be unfairness carried out in secret, or even unconsciously perhaps.

If a woman wants the right to vote, or to learn to read, surely this is not a case of trying to be like a man. And there are other cases less extreme. And others that are debatable, etc.

[Maximilianus]

Let's not forget the very elementary ingredients of curiosity and taste for challenge, characteristic of the human nature: "If a man can do it, why can't I?", or in men's case "If a woman can do it, why can't I?"

[FanofdeBeauvoir]

You need to define what is unique of the male being, as far as I'm concerned, I'm not gonna stop being who I am because to some that appears to be "trying to be a man", I'll be whoever I want to be, I have all rights to be my genuine-self no matter how ingenuine that may seem to others.

The only things I consider unique to the male are the pennis and the other reproductory stuff, like sperm yada yada...

[Maximilianus]

The only things I consider unique to the male are the penis and the other reproductory stuff, like sperm yada yada...
Are you sure we can judge uniqueness only considering physical features? Isn't it more or less the same as stating that women only have a vagina and ovaries as their only unique features?

I'm sure there must be a great many other features unique in men, and unique in women, that have little or nothing to do with their particular physiology.

Just to give a mild example, it's been many times said that women, in general of course, have a better talent for management, especially when they run on low resources. Does it have to do with genitals? I don't really think so.