PDA

View Full Version : Start to new satire...comments/critique needed



JBrower
06-04-2009, 12:13 PM
Here are the very rough first 3 paragraphs to a satire I started last night instead of sleeping. If you could read them and then let me know if, as a reader, it would be something you'd care to read and other critiques and such, I'd love you forever.


Love Like A Grocery List
(rough draft, paragraphs 1-3)

Matthew gazed down at the tiny slip of paper between his thumb and index finger, flicking it back and forth absentmindedly, not really taking in the neatly penned words; carefully printed in black ink, as slowly and neatly as he could manage between diligently doing homework and self-righteously telling his floormates to 'please shut the **** up if you wouldn't mind, considering its already 9:30 on a school night'. After all, he'd gone through five post-it notes until he finally managed to craft a list with nary a smudge, smear, or stray line (neighbors with loud music be damned!). Pensmanship was important, it lent validity to his endeavor.

Cautiously pressing the post-it onto the side of his index finger, Matthew read over the various items and impartial clauses, greeting each like an old friend--with what he liked to think of as his 'knowledgeable but sexy' smile--as he continued to bat at the corner of the paper with his thumb. It was a grocery list of sorts, this tiny slip of yellow paper, a bulleted, numbered list of the essential accoutrements possessed by any lady lucky enough to be hand selected as his very own college honey. Mommy and Daddy would be so proud of the one he was going to pick, this shopping list was that good. Today was grocery day; they were ripe for the picking.

Writing the list had taken some finangling--there were so many qualities selected as absolutely necessary for the young lady that would be his--but it was something of a work of art, if one were allowed to critically acclaim their own shopping document. Onto one tiny post-it, Matthew had neatly, carefully, neurotically, chauvinistically, printed eleven exacting standards that he felt confident would be met by any girl smart enough to fall in love with him (after his selection, naturally). Up until this brilliant list--this perfect, foolproof, love-defeating grocery dossier--the going had been rather tough. As such, no one had really gotten Matthew going. He had started the list, actually, as a message board thread to the running community. Are my standards too high? he wondered, via anonymous internet forum. Is any girl good enough to deserve to love me? All the runners, whom he thought were his people, had responded in the nastiest ways. They called him a prick, they told him to stop trying to make love a formula. Well, **** them. Every girl at Central Midwest University, it seemed, failed to possess every last quality that he considered essential for a woman to be good enough for him. But he had faith. Matthew knew, he really knew, that he was special, important, exceedingly full of himself, and would, as such, settle for no less than perfection in his pre-selected future mate (may the advice on his running message board be damned!).

krispykritta
06-11-2009, 11:26 PM
i like where its going, i would be curious to read the rest and see how it turns out for him. will he find the girl hes looking for or will this b a lesson in humility? i also liked how you used the word "accoutrements" i love that word and i always feel that it isnt used enough.

PrinceMyshkin
04-08-2010, 09:18 AM
Wonderfully funny, tongue-in-cheeky. I would certainly read on.

"Finangling" should be finagling and the plural of "forum" should be either forums or, to keep faith with the pretentiousness of your narrator, fora.

I'll be watching for the continuation of this.

Auriga
04-10-2010, 12:35 AM
It has an interesting premise. I think where this piece can really start to shine is in the man's actual encounters with the women he tries to weed out of the crowds that could potentially fit his well researched list.

As it stands, it's lingering somewhere uncomfortably between comedy/satire and a Tucker Max introduction. I think what's throwing me off a little bit is the third person narrator narrating the thoughts of the character, which sort of makes it seem as though he's sympathising with him. I think what would make it a bit more persuasive as a satire is if you tried doing less narration, to avoid that biased bending, and make more dialogue. I find the best satire really stands through on its dialogue. If you can make the dialogue where the guys complete douche-baggery shines through and not in the narration, then it would really make for a more interesting satire. But that's obviously a stylistic opinion, which is completely subjective, so it's probably different for other people who read satire.

CMM
04-10-2010, 03:01 PM
The main and only critique I can honestly offer is to shorten the first sentence. Seriously - it is far too long winded, especially for the first sentence of a story.

Hayseed Huck
04-11-2010, 12:22 PM
To my way of thinking-- satire presents confusion,
indecision, fits and starts and ends much where it
begins.

detailed planning is rarely the stuff of satire.

Unless a satire on a man who details to the point of
gross confusion.

Satire is a contradiction.

good luck,

HH