wateredwhisky
04-22-2009, 09:46 PM
What exactly is it that defines American "Roman Noir"? It would seem as if most noir novels are loosely based around crime, but it seems like it goes beyond that. Most people try to define it either by some sort of plot-based element (generally grouping it closer towards detective fiction or in the hard-boiled tradition of Hammett, Chandler, etc.) or through ideological means.
However, that doesn't really seem to sufficiently sum up noir. Nightmare Alley by Gresham is loosely based around "crime," but I'm not so keen on assuming that Stanton's actions are necessarily criminal. It would seem like there is some sort of an ideological undercurrent to noir that ends up defining it.
I just read an interesting article the other day while trying to find some answers. The author of the piece, William Marling was actually arguing that a lot of the conventions of the post-WWII noir are actually adopted from film noir, which was originally the brainchild of hard-boiled detective fict. He was noting that a lot of the common tropes of film noir (an emphasis on internal sets, drab and bleak lighting, a focus on still-frame aesthetics) actually ended up influencing their original sources.
It seems as if out of that influence the later noir novels were born, such as Highsmith's Ripley novels or Thompson's The Killer Inside Me that seem to focus less on the "whodunit" but more on the profile of a killer, questioning identity and the law. For example, David Goodis' Down There certainly deals with crime, but the real heart of the novel is about a man continually stuck in varying situations, jostled about by the world around him. That sense of helplessness just seems more pervasive than the crime elements. Is it possible that some of the after-effects of film noir influenced this stronger emphasis on ideological shapings of noir?
However, that doesn't really seem to sufficiently sum up noir. Nightmare Alley by Gresham is loosely based around "crime," but I'm not so keen on assuming that Stanton's actions are necessarily criminal. It would seem like there is some sort of an ideological undercurrent to noir that ends up defining it.
I just read an interesting article the other day while trying to find some answers. The author of the piece, William Marling was actually arguing that a lot of the conventions of the post-WWII noir are actually adopted from film noir, which was originally the brainchild of hard-boiled detective fict. He was noting that a lot of the common tropes of film noir (an emphasis on internal sets, drab and bleak lighting, a focus on still-frame aesthetics) actually ended up influencing their original sources.
It seems as if out of that influence the later noir novels were born, such as Highsmith's Ripley novels or Thompson's The Killer Inside Me that seem to focus less on the "whodunit" but more on the profile of a killer, questioning identity and the law. For example, David Goodis' Down There certainly deals with crime, but the real heart of the novel is about a man continually stuck in varying situations, jostled about by the world around him. That sense of helplessness just seems more pervasive than the crime elements. Is it possible that some of the after-effects of film noir influenced this stronger emphasis on ideological shapings of noir?