Robin555
11-07-2008, 12:22 PM
Having read many of the intelligent responses contained within these forums I'm hoping that there may be somebody out there who could help me with a literature essay I am currently writing.
The title of the essay I have chosen to tackle is regarding the restoration 'novel' Oroonoko by Aphra Behn and reads as follows:
"For Behn, neither race nor gender creates the category of the other and neither is as important as class, breeding and inherant nobility." (E.Smith)
Do you agree? Discuss the relationship between different sorts of power (e.g. sexual, colonial, literary / narrative, class) in Oroonoko.
Now, I certainly agree that Behn places places greater emphasis upon the preservation of the monarchy and the importance of adhering to will of the 'nobility' than any other social consideration and I intend to argue this in my essay.
I am also aware of the issues of race and gender in the 'novel' but when I contemplate E.Smiths assertation that "neither ... creates the category of the other." I simply don't understand what he means by this.
I have searched for this particular article by E.Smith so that I may be able to understand the context from which this quote is taken but have so far been unsuccessful.
Is there anybody out there who might be able to qualify the meaning of this quote? I do hope so!
Thanks
Robin
The title of the essay I have chosen to tackle is regarding the restoration 'novel' Oroonoko by Aphra Behn and reads as follows:
"For Behn, neither race nor gender creates the category of the other and neither is as important as class, breeding and inherant nobility." (E.Smith)
Do you agree? Discuss the relationship between different sorts of power (e.g. sexual, colonial, literary / narrative, class) in Oroonoko.
Now, I certainly agree that Behn places places greater emphasis upon the preservation of the monarchy and the importance of adhering to will of the 'nobility' than any other social consideration and I intend to argue this in my essay.
I am also aware of the issues of race and gender in the 'novel' but when I contemplate E.Smiths assertation that "neither ... creates the category of the other." I simply don't understand what he means by this.
I have searched for this particular article by E.Smith so that I may be able to understand the context from which this quote is taken but have so far been unsuccessful.
Is there anybody out there who might be able to qualify the meaning of this quote? I do hope so!
Thanks
Robin