PDA

View Full Version : "Yesterday's Mashed Potatoes"



AuntShecky
05-08-2008, 01:28 PM
“Yesterday’s Mashed Potatoes”

Although the thought had often passed through Arlene Henry’s mind before, this time she was convinced that Rocky had gone flat-out nuts. Symptoms of his dementia had broken out on every table, right next to each mesh-covered glass candle-holder. The unattractive devices looked like timers for chess matches or buzzers from a particularly tacky television game show. “What the hell are those?”

“Oh, those little alarm clocks? They're for Speed Dating Night.” In his continuous quest to bring in customers to Rocky’s Lounge as well as to coax a few more dollars out of their discretionary income, Rocky had tried, with various degrees of success --Trivia Nights, Battles of the Bands, Dartboard Tournaments, and preposterously-- since the demographics of his clientele typically skewed toward the AARP crowd-- a Wet T-Shirt Night. Arlene couldn't really blame Rocky for trying to make a buck, given the vagaries of the current economy, but it’s never easy. As Mama Rose says in Gypsy, “Ya gotta have a gimmick.”

“Didn't you see my signs? I put ‘em up all over the place.” Rocky showed her a sample. “SENIORS! Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places? Come to the RIGHT Place –Rocky’s! Senior Speed Dating Night! Friday, April 4. Music by the Lovely Arlene. No Cover .” Right away, Arlene knew it wouldn't work. First of all, the word “Senior” as in “Senior Citizen” was a real turn-off. Although most people would never reject a discount, they weigh the added savings against a reluctance to admit that their chronological ages were precipitously climbing toward that proverbial hill. That goes for males, as well as females; additionally, men had more wiggle-room in which to choose prospective partners. Given the choice, many an older guy would prefer a younger chick, whereas “mature” women, with the considerably smaller number of viable candidates, often find they have to take whom they can get.

No matter one’s gender or age, a person really loathes admitting that he or she “needs help” in the romance department, whether it comes from the Personal Ads in the Classified section, an Internet dating service, or the dreadful “blind date” set up by well-meaning friends and relatives who don't know enough to mind their own business. Such match-making methods all smack of desperation, not the most desirable acreage for planting the seeds of Love.

Arlene failed to see how Rocky’s latest scheme would bear fruit, but she kept her misgivings to herself. A gig is a gig, after all, despite the fact that she had to tell the guys in her combo that Rocky could only “afford” a solo act now.

Even without a rhythm section that night, every one of her numbers was counterpointed with a recurrent “ding” or a “buzz” coming from the tables, at which the ladies would stay seated while the prospective swains would hop from table to table like bees promiscuously sampling the pollen of various and sundry blossoms. A proscribed time limit dictated that each encounter would be necessarily “brief.” And within such limits, the gentleman was expected to make up his mind whether the damsel at Table Nine was the girl of his dreams or a superannuated gold digger. The lady likewise had to make an instantaneous decision as to whether the guy across from her would either sweep her off her therapeutically-shod feet or take her for every cent of her fixed income. Ah, Love, your magic spell is everywhere.

Avoiding the pool, Arlene plunged right into to her medley, played pianissimo so as not to drown out any couple’s all-important tête-à-tête. Rodgers and Hart’s wistful “My Romance”
Wide awake (Ding!)
My most fantastic dreams come true
segueing into Jerome Kern’s “A Fine Romance” with delightfully sardonic lyrics by the great Dorothy Fields:
We should be like a couple of hot tomatoes –
( Bzzt!)
But you're as cold as yesterday’s mashed potatoes. . .
These spuds look as if they'd been burped into the Tupperware long ago, Arlene thought. Not that she was some farm-fresh pullet herself. She remembered from years previously a high-profile news weekly that proclaimed as incontrovertible fact that once an unmarried American woman hit the magic age of 30, her odds against finding a husband were greater than being struck by lightning. At the time Arlene read the article, she had moved beyond electrocution by thunderstorm to getting hit by a safe falling from an office window. Now? Perhaps being swallowed by a crocodile.

Not to say chances hadn't come, and some of them she had been glad to see go-- when she herself did the leaving, as from the two or three who had somehow forgotten to mention their actual and current marital status. Then there were others with irreconcilable differences. There was the One With Bizarre Tastes, which she had discovered the first time she visited him at his apartment and went to hang up her coat. One glance at the contents of his closet and the coat was back on and she was out of there more quickly than you could say “de Sade.”

The last decade featured the One Who Bored Her To Tears. Initially they had enjoyed their mutual fascination with Major League Baseball; their lively discussions about George Brett’s pine tar, Joe Carter’s World Series winning walk-off home run soon changed up into the minutiae of the position of the pitcher’s fingers for various types of delivery, the intricacies of compiling obscure stats, finally convincing Arlene that the neurotic sports nut had to go, else she'd have to do No-Doz for the rest of her life.

Long before, there had been the One Who Got Away, He-Who-Must-Not-Be Named. “My romance,” a “fine romance,” indeed. Arlene looked out at the sparse “crowd” and didn't envy the widows and widowers, or more likely these days, the so-called “walking wounded” of divorce, whose broken hearts were motivated by that most insidious of emotions, hope, in that these “late bloomers” would finally harvest a blossoming love. Arlene’s cynical streak also tried to convince her that some of the men were looking for not so much someone to “share” their golden years but the comfort of a nurse. And the women, earnestly and altruistically seeking not so much to be cared for but to care, all while knowing that they would in most cases eventually outlive the hoped-for object of their nurturing. But to be honest, who is loath to accept a hug and a kiss now and then, or a Sunday ride through the countryside with someone else doing the driving?

That same evening, in a different establishment far off in the scenic Adirondacks, a barkeep hustled to keep up with demands of customers, the late-season skiers overlapping with the early- season trout fishermen, thanks to the fortuitous “location, location, location” of the Tamarack Inn. As he pulled one of many draft beers, somebody hit the jukebox to play a Frank Sinatra tune, a song that Lenny hadn't heard since a gal sang it live the previous New Year’s Eve. Whatshername, the one who played the piano and sang those old, old songs – - Eileen? Doreen? Something like that. If he hadn't been so busy, just out of curiosity, Lenny would've gone into the back and look her up in the files. Give her a call or somethin’. He recalled that she said she lived way the hell downstate, and with the high price of gas these days. . . Eh. He'd see. . .

Meanwhile, back at Rocky’s Arlene was wrapping up her medley
Might as well play bridge (Ding!) with my old maid aunt
I haven't got a chance, this is a fine romance

(Bzzt!) The sound came from the table closest to the piano. “Ooh!” The lady sitting there giggled like a girl. “Time’s up.”

DickZ
05-08-2008, 02:41 PM
Another very entertaining piece, Auntie, that captures an interesting aspect of life today! I particularly enjoyed the part about the reluctance to admit that we are aging when we reach our silver or golden years, whichever they are. The bees promiscuoulsly sampling the pollen is another clever line. And the part about sweeping her off her therapeutically-shod feet provides a lesson in creativity to all of us out here. But are you sure that the odds of finding a husband after reaching 30 are greater than getting hit by lightning? Aren’t those odds less than getting hit by said lightning? Maybe I should get into poker game with you.

I’ll pass this story on to my daughter’s mother-in-law, who runs singles parties. Many of her attendees are getting up there in age. She has lots of stories to tell about her parties, but your stories are always much more entertaining than hers.

AuntShecky
05-08-2008, 03:34 PM
Yep. Her chances of finding a husband are less (or fewer) than getting struck by lightning. So that will make the odds higher.

Grotesquery
05-09-2008, 10:00 PM
I enjoyed this story greatly. Your writing style is lovely in my opinion, if I may say so. I especially enjoyed the way that you chose to name her past significant others/partners/love interests.

"One With Bizarre Tastes, One Who Bored Her To Tears" and etc. :]

ampoule
05-14-2008, 02:37 PM
Oh, Auntie, this is just wonderful. I chuckled all the way through it. I also loved the way you named the fellas.
I have quit all the dreaded dating sites because my girlfriends keep telling me 'it' will happen when I'm not looking for it. My mother, on the other hand, tells me I just need someone to have sex with. Jiminy crickers. What's a girl to do?

AuntShecky
05-15-2008, 04:26 PM
Thanks for your comment, Ampoule.

APEist
05-19-2008, 01:27 AM
A fine memento mori, Aunt. You echoed the sentiments of my favorite poem, Maud Muller, to great effect. I loved the tie in, it really pulled it all together.

Only thing I have to criticize in your writing are sentences like this:

"Arlene’s cynical streak also tried to convince her that some of the men were lookin"

Your writing has already told us this about your character, Aunt. Basically, shut your yap! You have a wonderful way of letting your characters speak for themselves, Aunt, so step back from the podium!

Anyways, cheers, and thanks for the read.

DickZ
05-19-2008, 08:14 AM
A fine memento mori, Aunt. You echoed the sentiments of my favorite poem, Maud Muller, to great effect. I loved the tie in, it really pulled it all together.

Only thing I have to criticize in your writing are sentences like this:

"Arlene’s cynical streak also tried to convince her that some of the men were lookin"

Your writing has already told us this about your character, Aunt. Basically, shut your yap! You have a wonderful way of letting your characters speak for themselves, Aunt, so step back from the podium!

Anyways, cheers, and thanks for the read.
I guess we can all view the same thing differently, and often we do just that. I thought the line about Arlene's realization that some of the men were looking for a nurse was quite meaningful - and true. It made a nice addition to the delightful story.

AuntShecky
05-19-2008, 10:31 AM
Thanks to all for your comments.

APEist
05-20-2008, 12:00 AM
I guess we can all view the same thing differently, and often we do just that. I thought the line about Arlene's realization that some of the men were looking for a nurse was quite meaningful - and true. It made a nice addition to the delightful story.

I didn't quote the bit about what Arlene thought of the men, though. I liked that part as well, I just don't think you need to precede it with some 'telling' justification. I think Aunt's characterization speaks for itself, and doesn't need something to push it along.

You know what I mean?

edit: And you're welcome, Auntie!

kiz_paws
05-26-2008, 02:51 AM
Another gem, Auntie! I also chuckled my way through the story, the way that you tuck this and that in your writing keeps it so lively and so interesting (the names of the swains, what was in the closet, and the list goes on) ... :p :thumbs_up

AuntShecky
05-26-2008, 01:34 PM
Thank you Kiz and APEist, you're exactly right. In that sentence I may have broken the Cardinal Rule about showing not telling.

DickZ
05-27-2008, 08:21 AM
Thank you Kiz and APEist, you're exactly right. In that sentence I may have broken the Cardinal Rule about showing not telling.
Well, Auntie, would it be worthwhile to demonstrate your theory by presenting one sentence that 'shows' and another sentence that 'tells?' I'm not too clear on the difference, and I doubt that I'm the only one in that boat.

The sentence in question in this story might be the best to use as an example.

AuntShecky
05-27-2008, 01:54 PM
Thank you for your comment, Antiquarian. The scene in the end of this piece is an echo of two previous stories in which Arlene is a minor character:
""]Downhill" (http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31390)
and
"
[URL=""[URL="http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31415"]"]Amateur Night." (http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31415)


There is another story about her stitching together an economic existence in "Aren't You Glad You're You." (http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33713)
If interested, you can view Arlene in childhood as well in "
[URL=""[URL="http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31849"]"]
Best of the Blest." (http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31849)

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31849

DickZ
05-27-2008, 03:33 PM
Thank you for your comment, Antiquarian. The scene in the end of this piece is an echo of two previous stories in which Arlene is a minor character....
I think that including material that relates to previous stories is a great device, and can make good stories even better. I try to do exactly that in some of my stories.

Of course, for a reader to realize that, he/she has to have seen the previous stories, and has to remember them as well, which doesn't always happen. Still, writing to the most astute readers is probably the best way to go, even if lots of the less meticulous readers find these zingers whizzing over their heads.

AuntShecky
05-29-2008, 11:13 AM
As an editor, what would concern me more is the fact that nothing is at stake for the main character.

Another cardinal rule, almost as important as "Show, Don't Tell" is "never apologize, never explain." Instead of being
mealy-mouthed and defensive, the writer is supposed let the story stand or fall on its own merits or lack of them.

But I disagree about your assessment that Arlene has nothing "at stake." A way to assuage loneliness or an deep-seated bitterness over a less-than-fairy tale past or the
unfortunate and random aspect of lost opportunity (shown by the passage about the Adirondack bartender): are none
of these legitimate fodder for fiction? What about
my story's final two words?

I will not comment upon the criteria set up by your editorial board, but the Hollywood dictum (in which the main character has to "want" something) strikes me as a bit formulaic. I'm thinking about some masters of the genre and Joyce in particular. In his story "Clay" you can't really pinpoint what if anything is at stake for Maria, the poor laundress. Robert Scholes adores that story even though as he says, "nothing of any consequence happens." At the end of the story, Maria is the same woman under the same circumstances, but man, it packs a hell of a punch!

That-- not the ante in a literary poker game -- is the standard to which we would be writers should aspire.