PDA

View Full Version : What to write?



blazeofglory
12-29-2007, 09:19 PM
Writing is my hobby and reading is my obsession. I always kind of try to engross myself in writing. I feel nauseous if I spend a single day without scribbling something.

I am thin-skinned by nature, touchy type. Everything in nature, natural phenomena appeal to me immensely. I can not be blind to what I see around with my eyes open, the atrocities I am seeing around. When someone cries I can not help crying. Every sentimental song wells up tears in my eyes.

This is perhaps had led me to this writing job to jot down things responsively. This hypersensitiveness is perhaps a drive, an impetus that got me the man I am , a writer wherein you will find a writer differing from the rest of other genres. A writer is inherently sensible. Sensibilities is what we feed on in point of fact.


Everything around leads me to think. When I see a flower, a rose I simply become amazed at the beauty of it. I start thinking about the perfect art with which it is structured.

Everything in nature amazes me. A bird with its wonderful feathers and a mountain with its unruffled serenity startle me.

In my babyhood i was a great believer. I thought there must be a God that created everything. As I was brought up in a religious environment I was programmed to believe in God things. There used to be regular prayers and congregations.

I was a little out of the ordinary type, a kind of idiosyncratic in my babyhood. Unlike the rest of children I often passed my time mulling over things that are concerned with life, God and creation. That is why I read Holy books devouringly.

I read the Bhagavatam and other Sanskrit texts despite my little knowledge of Sanskrit. I enjoyed reciting Sanskrit Hymns immensely.

loggats
12-30-2007, 12:20 PM
shklovsky had an idea of the desensitised world as "algebraized" and breaking free of that is the pursuit of an independent, conscious mind.

chasestalling
01-04-2008, 07:29 AM
if i had a choice of reading one of two historians of equal talent, i'd choose the historian whose intimacy to his subject matter is personal.

writing based on impersonal observation smacks too much of a task to be completed or an obligation to be met for the sake of one's profession, career and way of life.

give me the historian who writes with his honor at the stake, not his livelihood. if it's money the historian needs then let him earn it with honest labor. i read for the sake of communing with a noble mind, not to be panhandled to by a clever rogue.