AuntShecky
10-19-2007, 01:26 PM
What do writing instructors mean when they tell us to "Show, don't tell" in our efforts at fiction?
First, we have to dial back our "literal" minds a bit. When we're writing a descriptive or persuasive essay or some other piece of non-fiction, our purpose is indeed "to communicate." To that aim, the most important quality is clarity.
But in fiction, we are trying to create a work of art. This requires not so much point-by-point literalism and straight narrative structure -- "telling" -- but a certain use of craft. By that I mean we don't necessarily have to proceed from point A to point B as in non-fiction to unfold the plot. We don't have to say "First this happened and then this happened." We don't have to "tell."
Instead fiction is subtle and more nuanced. The story unfolds through what the characters do and what they say -- action and dialogue. Instead of "telling"the author is showing.
One example that comes to mind is a short story by Stephen Crane.
http://www.online-literature.com/crane/2544/
He could have begun "The Open Boat" with a long explanation-- or a mundane who-what-where-when-why sort of newspaper account -- of how the men arrived in their predicament, a history of each character (although there is a brief flashback or two later in the story), families left back home, etc., etc. Nor does Crane start the story with a mundane explanation: "Well, the men all had their heads down, so busily rowing that they couldn't stop and look around, yaddah-yaddah." Instead, he tells us everything we need to know about what the story will show us in the very first sentence:
"No one knew the color of the sky."
And you will note throughout the story, the author SHOWS us how the sailors are faring. As the captain says: " 'Do you think We've got much of a show now, boys?' said he."
(Yes, we do, indeed.)
First, we have to dial back our "literal" minds a bit. When we're writing a descriptive or persuasive essay or some other piece of non-fiction, our purpose is indeed "to communicate." To that aim, the most important quality is clarity.
But in fiction, we are trying to create a work of art. This requires not so much point-by-point literalism and straight narrative structure -- "telling" -- but a certain use of craft. By that I mean we don't necessarily have to proceed from point A to point B as in non-fiction to unfold the plot. We don't have to say "First this happened and then this happened." We don't have to "tell."
Instead fiction is subtle and more nuanced. The story unfolds through what the characters do and what they say -- action and dialogue. Instead of "telling"the author is showing.
One example that comes to mind is a short story by Stephen Crane.
http://www.online-literature.com/crane/2544/
He could have begun "The Open Boat" with a long explanation-- or a mundane who-what-where-when-why sort of newspaper account -- of how the men arrived in their predicament, a history of each character (although there is a brief flashback or two later in the story), families left back home, etc., etc. Nor does Crane start the story with a mundane explanation: "Well, the men all had their heads down, so busily rowing that they couldn't stop and look around, yaddah-yaddah." Instead, he tells us everything we need to know about what the story will show us in the very first sentence:
"No one knew the color of the sky."
And you will note throughout the story, the author SHOWS us how the sailors are faring. As the captain says: " 'Do you think We've got much of a show now, boys?' said he."
(Yes, we do, indeed.)