PDA

View Full Version : What was Orwell trying to accomplish



Houndicus
10-10-2005, 11:46 AM
Hey, i gotta compare 1984 with Fahrenheit 451, which ae both kick-*** books too read, but i gotta mainly base it on main characters, and how the authors of each book represent their views through the characters.

I need some background information on when 1984 was written, and what Orwell was trying to say about society. I don't know whether to write about the McCarthy era, or the rise in commmunism etc, so any help??

This is the opening of my essay so far if it helps. I just gotta follow it up with a little contextual information, but im unsure. Thanks:

How do George Orwell (1984) and Ray Bradbury (Fahrenheit 451) use their main characters to express their viewpoints?

In both ‘1984’ and ‘Fahrenheit 451,’ both the authors use their main character as a platform to show their views; essentially on society and the possibility of a dictatorial government if their power is abused, although these two protagonists exist in very different settings, both of which are highly controlled by the government. In 1984, the government appears to have blatant control, merely brainwashing the people into their beliefs: “In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five and you would have to believe it.” Fahrenheit 451 is dissimilar to this however, as the government merely takes advantage of the people’s decision to give up on books, and therefore, the freedom of imagination and genuine happiness:
“...everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy.”
What is noticeable is that both main characters are, in a sense, liberated by the end of the novel and have a dramatic change in their lifestyles and the way they think and act, through certain acts of the government. They both notice what is wrong with their lives; boredom and oppression overriding their lives, and they try to change the way they and others in society will think. John 3:32 from the bible sums this up well with, “And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
Michael Levy writes:
“The novel (1984) can be seen as an attack on Senator Joseph McCarthy’s early 1950s anti-Communist crusade, during which the senator and his supporters attempted to subject government workers, politicians, journalists, and artists to strict government scrutiny.”
Similar to this, Orwell seems to be trying to portray the dangers of a government with absolute power and control of its subjects. 1984 can most definitely be interpreted as an incitement against communism; the Cold War ever-present at the time of writing; 1984 has a devastatingly dictatorial regime running, with the ‘Thought Police’ representing the brutal Nazi Gestapo Police with overruling power and an iron fist.


This is all i got so far, i just need some contextul around this point. It would be great if anyone can help, cheers

:p

mofo erectus
10-13-2005, 03:27 PM
Hi man, haven't ever got around to reading Fareheit 451, but I'll be sure to try it out after reading yer post. I have read 1984 though, and am a massive fan of George Orwell's - as a writer and a real life bloke!

A few things I'd say about 1984, in case it helps. Although in 1984 the party in charge is ostensibly 'English Socialist', or EngSoc (therefore an allegory for dictatorial communism), the main thing that Orwell is trying to convey in 1984 is how easily people en masse can be manipulated into a state of utter obedience by a totalitarian government. Hysteria, propaganda, suspicion, division and fear create passive, timid subjects who are blindly obedient. This is true of totalitarian sets of all political persuasions, and of modern day jihadists who brainwash young people in killing themselves and others for yet another fundamentalist ideology.

The bitter sting in the ending to 1984 is that Big Brother WINS in the end. The truth that Winston Smith has discovered in the course of the novel, the truth about his own humanity and the fragile artifice of the Party's world, is DESTROYED during his long period in the Ministry Of Love. Tortured mentally and physically, he surrenders his love for Julia by betraying her; and at the end of the novel he is a broken, drunken shell; like the broken, drunken old revolutionaries he remembers earlier in the novel. And the last line confirms the awful new truth forced upon him by the state - he LOVES Big Brother.

(Also: 1984 was written around 1948 and published in 1949, so predates the McCarthy era witch hunts; it was more a reaction to Orwell's own experiences of fascism and communism during and after his years fighting in the Spanish Civil War.

Check out my blog 'Tales From Airstrip One' on my MySpace for some more 1984 guff. www.myspace.com/mofoerectus. :p

Houndicus
10-17-2005, 05:51 AM
Cheers mofo, helped loads

dano420
10-23-2005, 12:50 AM
The story was written in 1949 during the height of communist paranoia in this country. Nine years after a guy named A.H. Auden published a poem called "The Unknown Cititzen." This has remarkable similarities to the governmental eutopias of Orwell and Bradbury. (Note the name of the Citizen) In all cases the government is afraid of the free thinkers. They know, given time and access to books or freedom of thought, any intelligent human being will revolt against a government "protecting him from himself for his own good." Scary Huh? Think about Homeland Security and ask yourself if these stories have any relevance today....

ennison
11-12-2006, 06:12 PM
Orwell was criticising the direction that state socialism was taking and the way that appeared to have led to a Cold War that created opposing blocs. The Soviet system raised lying to be a creed and trampled individual rights underfoot. There is no doubt that he was far more concerned with Soviet totalitarianism and the recently defeated German nationalist dictatorship than any kind of Western politics.